- Samsung Galaxy S4 vs Galaxy S III: Advanced fence-sitting
- Google Nexus 4 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: Fan favorites
- LG Optimus G v Samsung Galaxy S III: Beast wars
- Apple iPhone 5 vs. Samsung Galaxy S III: All rise
- Samsung Galaxy S III vs. Note II: Sizing up
- Samsung Galaxy S III Jelly Bean review: Bread and butter
- Quad-core shootout: Four of a kind
- Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the third
- Specifications
- Compare
- Pictures
- 360° view
- In the news (new)
- Manual
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.8
- Features
-
7.3
- Performance
-
7.3
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Why PenTile?! WHY?!?!
This really ruins the Galaxy S 3 for me.
- Reply
- 2012-05-05 00:53
- nmH4
- C
- inistine
- Report
- 0
where is the 2 gig ram my god i will keep my note no big difference gorila 2 huh 300 mah battery differnce the processor is no use dual core is enough ram was a must my gosh
- Reply
- 2012-05-05 00:53
- fXD$
- U
- komsa
- Report
- 0
.........i am former S2 user and i think it was fantastic model but S3 is too big and plasticky :)
- Reply
- 2012-05-05 00:43
- 0TnH
- U
- neat
- Report
- 0
sammy's fanboys are so funny hahaha
If sammy had released a phone with a 41mp camera they would say samsung is the most innovating mobile company. But Nokia did it and now they're all ranting abt how they dont need a 41mp camera, Very funny 4 example look at the oversized screen of this phone, is there innovation in this kinda design??? UGLY!!!
- Reply
- 2012-05-05 00:13
- ftKH
- U
- neat
- Report
- 0
nokia might not announce a quad core wp8 this year, but i bet they would definately give us a dual core with 12mp and all the other features we have been calling 4 that would outclass this ugly phone in design.
look out 4 the nxt lumia!
- Reply
- 2012-05-05 00:06
- ftKH
- U
- Matt
- Report
- 0
Was going to get this phone, but it's huge! Like between the Note and S II. I think i'll just save money and get the S II.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:58
- qU}u
- C
- Eddie
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Escher @ 2012-05-04 21:27 from 8Tvq - click to readyes its a only 1.3 mp on front camera but its 720p dude!
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:57
- IVGi
- R
- H
- Report
- 0
Samsung can't make anythink right not even phone is to big for a phone and again they are tryng to copy the Iphone. The quad processor is the only good think for this phone but again what is the use o this processor. Make app's for this phone to gain popularity on the market.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:48
- LaB9
- H
- Laziale
- Report
- 0
Very good mobile, My SII is doing me just fine but if I want to buy I just made a compare between SIII & HTC one X , I will take the SIII Hands down for battery & micro sd . And guys do u really need 12 or even 80 MP camera on your mobile phone !? 8 MP...1080P (30Fps) is truly enough for a mobile phone At this time ,
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:40
- 0FI0
- U
- AK
- Report
- 0
I've been a proud owner of the Original Galaxy S, for 2 years now. Now we can go ranting about it still being plasticky, design not so great blah blah...but the fact that my 2 year old GS can run buttery smooth on 1 Single Core, makes me wonder what this BEAST is capable of!!! All said and done, these are great days for tech lover like us folks!!! So njoy power!!!
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:33
- Q18Z
- U
- Baby Wade
- Report
- 0
I think the LTE version is gonna dual-core because the exynos 4 quad does not support LTE.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:28
- Imk@
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Good phone I say. designwise its practical though not stunning.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:25
- fnGF
- U
- brynn
- Report
- 0
> In reply to ExpertReign @ 2012-05-04 22:20 from tD}T - click to readWhat i meant was before 7PM last night SGS3 had about a million hits now its over 2million.Anyhow when is i9800 been launched tho,,I have done without a decent phone for a month now waiting for SGS3 and now got to wait till May 30th at least.If this i9800 is not even on radar yet i cant be bothered waiting any longer..
Now i do agree one thing they got wrong last night was they said it was available now but not really ,still a 3 week wait..Thats even if its released on pay as you go here in UK i am not getting a contract ever again.
- Reply
- 2012-05-04 23:07
- nG31
- R


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up