Zin, 08 Jun 2012Hey guys without experience by touching Samsung Galaxy S3 don't say this phone is made up of c... moreSaw it, Touch it, Hold it, Try it, Yes Cheap Plastic & Ugly, but i will still buy it when Samsung slash 25% off the current price list :-P
If you are concerned about build quality then check my video review: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...feature=plcp
Seriously these phone looks like a mini tablet like wtf it's like carrying a mini box in your box. I laugh, hahaha.
Bad phone, very bad.
cheap, 08 Jun 2012most ugliest phoneYou obviously haven't seen one in the flesh my friend.
[deleted post]Approx 38K, prices ranges from 37.5k to 38.5k from shop to shop, prices analysed in Vadodara and Pune.
Hey guys without experience by touching Samsung Galaxy S3 don't say this phone is made up of cheap plastic or design wise this phone is ugly because first time i saw a real pic on gsmarena.com i also thought this phone looks cheaper and ugly design, but after i saw this phone from a shop and i touch it by my hand i'm surprise, I just want to say this phone looks much better then i thought. This phone looks great and the best design so far in the market. Now i have Galaxy S3 and i realy love this phone. Galaxy S3 is the best phone so far.
This isn't the king of Android. S3 is an emperor of Android empire...at least for now.
does anyone know if the S3 has autopause feature where the phone automatically pauses when the earphones are accidentally pulled out?
Y so many posting here how great S2 is? You cant compare the two, S2 has a gigantic screen at very low pixel resolution, a resolution we used on or 3.5inch fones back in 2009! Like Nokia N900. In 2009! Dont come and say a 800x480 fone is good in 2012, when the display is that huge, like its made for disabled person with weak eyes and shaky hands. S2 is one of the worst fones i have used, it belongs in 2010 already.
S3 must be compared with Galaxy Note. IMHO, Note is still the better, less bloatware, better battery, higher resolution. For now S3 requires custom ROM to run efficiently, and the display shud have been smaller to separate it more from the Galaxy Note. Xperia S is out there for those who dont believe 1280x720 is good on smaller displays, have a look and you will be convinced.
Anonymous, 08 Jun 2012You wouldnt even know that yet. If you did compare the both please show us you videos. The tes... moreI'm using S3 now.
Don't be mistaken that I'm trying to put S3 down. Its a great phone when comes to mulitmedia. The video output is one of the best I have seen this far.
But when it comes to processes, I'm not sure why Samsung need to run so many at its background . That maybe one of the reason, IMO, that S3 is not as responsive as Razr.
cheap, 07 Jun 2012Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III good but not King of AndroidDear cheap,I dont agree with u.Its king of droids and it could be king of smart phones.
Anonymous, 08 Jun 2012Its a matter on how Samsung write the processes. If the phone require to run many processes... moreYou wouldnt even know that yet. If you did compare the both please show us you videos. The tests already proved the S3 was well optimized
beasty, 08 Jun 2012
this phone is good...but.. why not 2G RAM?Its a matter on how Samsung write the processes.
If the phone require to run many processes at the background, even with 2GB RAM or quad core CPU , the phone will not be "fast".
I'm using Razr XT910 previously, IMO, the Razr is so much more responsive compare to S3.
beasty, 08 Jun 2012 this phone is good...but.. why not 2G RAM?One of the versions is to first off. second what in the world are you going 1gb let alone 2gb??
zaheer, 07 Jun 2012Can anyone suggest me.. In Samsung Galaxy.. Note is best or S3...? Please any one replay...offcourse s3 is best in the world