Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
7.7
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.7
- Votes:
- 467
- Hits:
- 139778
- brendan tennant
- Report
> In reply to Mobile Guru @ 2008-06-26 16:08 from mpbPi don't know but come to think of it it does look similiar you are on the right lines
- Reply
- 2008-07-14 16:14
- mqLh
- R
- brendan tennant
- Report
my mate has got this phone and he has said that the buttons have come out and he has only had the phone for a week but you can't trust him with any phone lol
- Reply
- 2008-07-14 16:12
- mqLh
- U
- Mobile Guru
- Report
Looks a little like a cross between a G600 & G800 in black... what u lot think...
- Reply
- 2008-06-26 16:08
- mpbP
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-06-25 22:54 from P43PBut I will !
- Reply
- 2008-06-26 12:40
- iGfA
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to discovery @ 2008-06-26 10:38 from ph$WThere is so many other Samsung phones with 320*240 , even 240 x 440. They are all highpriced. What`s wrong with you people. There is entry class and midle class of phones to, you now, with prices from 50e-150e. !
- Reply
- 2008-06-26 12:38
- iGfA
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
* Good looks
* A 2.2", 176x220 screen seems a bit odd to me but Samsung followed the same principle when it started producing 2", 128x160 screens.
* I don't think that the Luxe moniker fits this phone. The L870 is a more deserving unit, but then how will this phone sell if it ain't got something that gives a bit of excitement. Yeah, 'J800 Luxe' would probably help sell more of it than by just being 'J800'.
- Reply
- 2008-06-26 04:47
- 2Ats
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
18 MB shared memory, 2mp NO AF, a 2.2 inches with 176 x 220 pixels? its like my 2 years old nokia with 3G. never would buy it
- Reply
- 2008-06-25 22:54
- P43P
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed