Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.2
- wowzers
- Report
looks cheap despite the logo...
so many other better phones out there why would anyone get this one?
- Reply
- 2008-09-24 10:10
- P{tY
- U
- shakil
- Report
Design is not innovative, cheap look just like lg kg195. shame samsung & georgio armani.
3.2 mp camera without flash is useless
- Reply
- 2008-09-23 16:43
- upqU
- U
- KL Fairy
- Report
The specs are fine. If the battery has a super long talk time, then this phone shall be a steal!! Hope the price won't break the bank though.
- Reply
- 2008-09-23 13:58
- ib6$
- C
- Numaan
- Report
The handset looks real good .. but i heard its for night-life style ... but why doesn't it not have flash for NIGHT-LIFE?
BOO!!!
SONY ERICSSON ROCK!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-09-23 13:40
- mprS
- U
- Luke
- Report
Does not look a bad phone, some of the features could have been improved for example a flash on camera and more memory if its designed for a younger target market.
- Reply
- 2008-09-23 12:36
- S35r
- U
- tech fanatic
- Report
the phone is nice...features are good...price will make or brake this phone.
- Reply
- 2008-09-23 11:25
- 04%y
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed