- Nokia N8 vs. Samsung Pixon12 vs. Sony HX5v shootout: Blind test
- Sony Ericsson Satio vs. Samsung Pixon12: 12MP shootout
- Samsung M8910 Pixon12 review: By the dozen
- Samsung M8910 Pixon12 preview 2: Some sequels are better
- Samsung M8910 Pixon12 preview 1: Firing the first rounds
- Specifications
- Compare
- Pictures
- 360° view
- Manual
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.2
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Stupid idea,Samsung! @ 2010-07-14 18:40 from 3ifK - click to readthat is why there's external memory.
- Reply
- 2010-07-16 05:01
- PVhK
- R
- really???
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Stupid idea,Samsung! @ 2010-07-14 18:40 from 3ifK - click to readlolll.... hes back!! bro u got way too much time on ur hands!!!
if this is the best thing youve got to do...... seriously brother how old r u???... grow up mate.
- Reply
- 2010-07-15 11:48
- wgV5
- R
- Stupid idea,Samsung!
- Report
- 0
Internal memory is only (150)MB!!.
=(
WHY,WHY Samsung??.
- Reply
- 2010-07-14 18:40
- 3ifK
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to kim sang @ 2010-07-14 06:41 from uCm3 - click to readyes it has touchwiz ui 2.0 :)
- Reply
- 2010-07-14 17:31
- 3aF$
- R
- albania
- Report
- 0
the samsung s8000 jet is the best phone in the world..
- Reply
- 2010-07-14 16:39
- mD6X
- U
- sea-breeze
- Report
- 0
> In reply to kim sang @ 2010-07-14 06:41 from uCm3 - click to readtouch wiz 2
- Reply
- 2010-07-14 15:42
- NhTP
- R
- sea-breeze
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Greybeard @ 2010-07-09 13:50 from t5WU - click to readU've got a defective device ..
the screen response is amazing best in class near to the capacitive touch screen .., the fone is blazing fast its based on 800mhz cpu !!!
something wrong with ur fone !
- Reply
- 2010-07-13 14:50
- NhT}
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Greybeard @ 2010-07-09 13:50 from t5WU - click to readgotta disagree with u bro,, only con i can agree with u on is the lack of samsung customer support..
pretty much all my mates have iphones and i dont really notice any difference with the speed/ touch sensitiveness of the phone.
considering i grabbed this off the net for like $400. Im wrapped with it.
- Reply
- 2010-07-13 08:54
- wgV5
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Does it have Wifi? The specs says it only has WLAN but not all phone with WLAN have Wifi. Please enlighten me. Thanks.
- Reply
- 2010-07-13 05:59
- PVhK
- U
- sea-breeze
- Report
- 0
> In reply to M8910 Pixon12 @ 2010-07-12 19:08 from 3ifK - click to readu should compare N8 with M8920 or w880amoled .. m8910 pixon12 is out there for around a year !!!!!!
- Reply
- 2010-07-13 03:35
- NhT}
- R
- M8910 Pixon12
- Report
- 0
Nokia N8 model camera IS much more better!!!.
http://www.gsmarena.com/behind...ews-1798.php
- Reply
- 2010-07-12 19:08
- 3ifK
- H
- sea-breeze
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Spiros @ 2010-07-08 17:15 from 0TuR - click to readi agree and add
very very stable software never never hangs
ver very fast fone ! super fast
- Reply
- 2010-07-10 03:03
- NhUF
- R
- sea-breeze
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-07-09 18:54 from 3ifK - click to readn8 not out yet am using my pixon12 for almost a year !! looooollll for sure am gonna stick for the pixon12 untill proved by the gsmarena team that n8 has a better camera.
i mean N8 vs Pixon12 camera shots !
- Reply
- 2010-07-10 03:02
- NhUF
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Nokia N8 are much more better camera,what Samsung M8910 Pixon 12:
http://www.gsmarena.com/damian...ews-1801.php
What you think this???. ;)
- Reply
- 2010-07-09 18:54
- 3ifK
- U
- Greybeard
- Report
- 0
I have owned this phone for 8 months. It's most probably the worst phone I've ever bought. The reasons are
- expensive (and NOT value for money)
- slow performance
- browser is poor/unresponsive/difficult to use
- first phone i've ever had that loses phone numbers
- poor user interface (unlike my previous Samsung phones)
- extremely poor support from Samsung (no updates, etc)
- antenna reception is worse than any of my other phones i've owned
- touch screen is very unresponsive compared to Apple hardware (it's fairly bad - I think resistive technology screens are all like this??)
positives
- beautiful screen quality
- resolution of screen very good
- photo resolution is better than good for a phone/camera (although images are noisy due to small image sensor size)
- video capture is particularly good
- audio quality is quite good
Honestly, I just can't bear to use this phone because of the shitty user interface (slow/clumsy and that awful side menu that you just can't eliminate).
I will wait out the rest of my phone contract and see if I can get an Android phone with a new plan (or maybe an iPhone if they iron out the design issues).
For your own sake, don't buy this phone.
Joe D Plumber
- Reply
- 2010-07-09 13:50
- t5WU
- H
- Spiros
- Report
- 0
Country: Greece
Period of using this device: 8 months
Type of use: Calls, texts, photos (less internet surfing)
PROS:
- Great Screen (great contrast, colors and sensitivity)
- Great Photos
- Great contraction and material quality
- WiFi
- Xenon flash for photos / Led flash for night video recording
CONS:
- Led flash not powerful enough.
- Average battery life (needs charging every 2nd day with average use)
- Average call signal sensitivity
- Less than average WiFi signal sensitivity
- Displays only the first 12 letter characters of each contact name
- Voice recording limit (max 60 min.)
- Blurry night video capture even with sufficient lighting conditions (that is caused because it lacks manual focus @ ∞ feature. Focus @ face and autofocus, which are the only choices, both fail to do the job)
- Crazy Gyroscope during photo reproduction (useless and annoying feature)
- Zooming in and out during photo reproduction is done by drugging your finger on the screen and in most cases gets out of control.
- Message delivery report comes as sms … You constantly have to delete them.
- Slightly curved photos (due to wide angle lens?).
- Absolutely horrible YOUTUBE video reproduction (hiccups, hiccups, hiccups…)
- Samsung software update and support.
- Reply
- 2010-07-08 17:15
- 0TuR
- H
- WayneT
- Report
- 0
Had this phone for around 6 months & am very happy. I upgraded from the Nokia N82. I loved the N82 but wanted a better camera.
User interface not the easiest in the world but worth it given the quality of the camera. I wanted a camera with a phone rather than the other way round.
Can't find a tv-out cable anywhere (I'd apreciate help here if anyone knows). Bought it on e-bay as it isn't available in New Zealand & no problems with supply/price etc.
If you want an amazing camera on a phone that's pretty reliable & filled with useful features - get your wallet out & buy one :)
- Reply
- 2010-07-05 13:26
- vxG2
- U

