Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.0
- Performance
-
7.1
- hotpot
- Report
- 0
this is a nice dsign cause am a gal but i dont like the features
- Reply
- 2009-12-02 15:02
- MkXk
- U
- SHANe
- Report
- 0
basicaly samsung s5230 with better design to suit girls
- Reply
- 2009-12-02 05:39
- vw6K
- U
- franky
- Report
- 0
> In reply to jay @ 2009-11-20 17:04 from PSvM - click to readr u blind or wat.. can u see it got 3.15mp camers
- Reply
- 2009-12-02 02:20
- vwc%
- R
- sekundes @_@
- Report
- 0
too bad there's no WLAN nor 3G. this could have been a sure winner @_@
- Reply
- 2009-12-02 02:14
- 9Lb6
- U
- JorgeFlores
- Report
- 0
Its excelent for my wife that only like design but no features.
- Reply
- 2009-12-01 19:08
- 5%rp
- U
- fadz
- Report
- 0
i think this phone is intended for the low-budget users like me. i will definitely buy this if the price is going to be less than 200usd. at least its a touchscreen phone.
- Reply
- 2009-12-01 19:01
- 4YBX
- U
- gamikzone
- Report
- 0
This phone is disappointing, i know maybe good for a girl who cares more about the design than whats inside.
- Reply
- 2009-12-01 16:31
- 3LA1
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
please improve this phone, must have flash, amoled, and better features, and please newer phone must be better phone......
- Reply
- 2009-12-01 15:11
- P@cf
- U
- R@K€B
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-11-21 13:50 from 36Em - click to readno .... this phone like s5600v blade
- Reply
- 2009-11-21 19:12
- 3ZIw
- R


Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up