Samsung S9402 Ego - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.1%
Total hits:
260336

Voting results

Design
6.9
Features
6.8
Performance
6.8
Votes:
586

Sort by:

good cell phone

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-22 19:34
  • u1vS
  • U

i like this phone and i like to by now just to now price

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-18 12:53
  • SrhT
  • H

its a good dual sim phone with a rugged design. it would be better if they also included a built in TV OUT festures

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-16 05:12
  • whBq
  • U

you are wrong. nokia doesnt own vertue nokia is only a contractor for make the internal hardware of the phone...

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-05 10:15
  • vpdF
  • U

Hey Vertu, you gotta sue

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-05 03:02
  • ftk}
  • U

Lol samsung tried to make a vertu lookalike.

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-03 10:12
  • 4SiY
  • U

> In reply to Jack Bubble @ 2009-01-27 11:47 from RDXJ - click to readNice review pretty funny

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-02 21:27
  • vGBV
  • R

worthless

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-01 23:50
  • MGFw
  • U

basically the look of this fone is good, and i love the idea of dual active sim card, but at the same time there are minuses everywhere. not a quadband nor HSDPA, no second camera for video call, very weak battery life, very very overpriced (did i mention very..lol)...i really do hope that samsung shall revise its feature before it shall hit the market.

  • Reply
  • 2009-02-01 18:17
  • PAq%
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-01-12 20:56 from 0BBH - click to readagree! now samsung copies nokia since nokia owns vertu company

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-31 18:29
  • nCby
  • R

looking at 1 spec from everythin ... it has dual sim function ... all the fones that has dual sim function, it doesnt have bluetooth 2.0 and dual sim.. plus its for every1 thats wants a vertu :P:P ... but still 1200 EUROs is a little too much.. 300 to 500 EUROs is enough for it

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-29 01:40
  • fv5G
  • C

Thanks for your comments muggers. I feel you dont know the reason for the overprice jewel of a piece.It is a limited edition fancy model which will be studded with diamonds...available on request in the market.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-27 11:56
  • RDXJ
  • U

This phone is really heavier in weight. Try hitting someone using this phone and it will defintely cause lot of pain.
Its close to 500grams in weight, a total metallic body

Overall i would go a rating of 2/10

Should be used during military warfare, throw this phone on someone's head and he will for sure die. Its the most heaviest phone which i have experienced

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-27 11:47
  • RDXJ
  • H

Hey guys ! samsung has produced this LUXURY phone for entering it in challenge with 8800s and Moto-A , so don't expect so much variety in features & performance . Just 5MP camera is enough for it !! :-}}

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-24 10:26
  • prnE
  • U

no 3g
no wlan
very strange design
and that price...wow!!!
whats wrong with samsung!?

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-20 15:54
  • 3Iq2
  • U

sick phne woh needs to buy vertu when u have a replacement such as good

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-19 02:38
  • pKYN
  • C

Read the description of this phone its one of the first mainstream companies to produce a DUAL SIM phone. that in its self will make this phone sell.

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-16 14:56
  • Mx@E
  • U

no wlan ???

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-13 23:59
  • 0x6K
  • C

nyc too bulky

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-13 16:31
  • NaD}
  • U

why is samsung trying to copy vertu ????

  • Reply
  • 2009-01-12 20:56
  • 0BBH
  • Q
Sort by:
Total of 126 user reviews and opinions for Samsung S9402 Ego.