Samsung Galaxy Note N7000 review: Power play 
Nokia N9 review: Once in a lifetimeSamsung S9402 Ego - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.9
- Features
-
6.8
- Performance
-
6.8
- Faka
- Report
- 0
Watafa!!!
1200 frikkin EUR crazy,, aparently samsung havent heared about the credit crunch
- Reply
- 2008-12-20 00:50
- iK1n
- U
- docstanz
- Report
- 0
Dual sim phones has always been my thing. I like the picture but i have yet to see the actual thing. i just hope its not as expensive when its already available.
- Reply
- 2008-12-18 15:37
- vxey
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
look at the price group for this fone . why is this fone so expensive ? there's nothin great bout those specs
- Reply
- 2008-12-18 15:25
- 2THV
- U
- el terrible
- Report
- 0
y es rica ono ese amor tucan te va a meter la nariz por el ano
- Reply
- 2008-12-18 14:03
- iBtv
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
samsung has the weirdest way of naming their phones...i mean "EGO?"
- Reply
- 2008-12-17 11:09
- wY84
- U
- thea
- Report
- 0
my gosh! you don't have any idea about this phone yet you said that you hope someone will buy it?check your grammar NAD.. :)
- Reply
- 2008-12-17 06:17
- RDXJ
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
OK,this phone is expensive, to be honest i would not buy a phone like this, its has not got alot of features it looks ugly. and i do not know what is so special about this phone, and why it is so expensive. but thanks for making this phone i am sure someone out there will like it.
- Reply
- 2008-12-16 14:01
- NaD}
- C
- basheeth
- Report
- 0
this cost havy but wifi option no that one traback. than free gps
- Reply
- 2008-12-15 12:54
- vGkM
- C
- Artanis
- Report
- 0
It is sure similar to Vertu but it has a 5 megapixel camera, dual sim, scratch-resistant display and very durable skin. How fascinating.. Chack this link: http://www.gsmarena.com/wnd_wi...00-2168.php.
- Reply
- 2008-12-14 00:42
- w0QN
- U
- juuulllyyyyyyy
- Report
- 0
only 3:30 min talk time . that's shame for a dualsim phone.
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 23:38
- prmi
- U
- christi osei
- Report
- 0
it looks quite a nice phone but the price is quite expensive.
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 18:09
- fsWs
- U
- ViL
- Report
- 0
a good phone but comparing it to vertu..
its just too much..
this phone is capable competeing with 8800 series but not with vertu..
they are completely different class..
anyway i prefer continental series the iPhone series LOL
- Reply
- 2008-12-09 13:36
- uEDr
- U
- jun
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-12-06 22:32 from 5%rr - click to readthis phone easily looks better than any vertu phones? come on lets be real here. Design alone, this phone don't come anywhere close to vertu. its an insult to vertu to even compare the two. i have much respect for samsung but i honestly have no idea what triggered them to produce this good for nothing cr@p
- Reply
- 2008-12-09 03:44
- R}iQ
- R
- BoA_cOnstrictor
- Report
- 0
beautiful design....but 1200 Euros!????! : ' (
- Reply
- 2008-12-08 16:21
- ibqx
- U
- anonymous
- Report
- 0
looks pretty much like vertu, even the hefty price tag
- Reply
- 2008-12-07 05:45
- 4L{2
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Stop whining about it looking like a vertu, this phone easily looks better than any vertu phone I've seen. Also, for those of you complaining about 3G and comparing to the vertu. None of the vertu phones listed on this site have 3G either and at least one of them is MUCH more expensive. If you don't like it, don't buy it. This phone obviously wasnt meant for you.
- Reply
- 2008-12-06 22:32
- 5%rr
- U
