Samsung Star 3 s5220 - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
1.0%
Total hits:
996008

Voting results

Design
5.8
Features
5.8
Performance
5.7
Votes:
35


Sort by:

Its very very gud mobile and all this comments are fake

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-27 13:26
  • vG5G
  • R

good model

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-23 14:09
  • vIw7
  • C

it is the worst model of samsung so don't waste ur money.it is not a smartphone.internet is very slow.its menu looks very poor.it has same functions as smsng champ but only with bigger screen.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-18 17:16
  • Xutq
  • C

this Phone is not Good because it will not support the video player in the internet and in the phone there is no good option so please nobody can buy this phone

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-07 06:23
  • uts%
  • U

Micromax a52 have better specification than this at same price . A52 is android and 1 ghz processor.

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-05 08:36
  • fCQM
  • U

Its not a smartphone, so don't get expectant about super fast email and photo editing etc. but the best qualities for me are that battery life is decent, and the composing text display and numeric keyboard are big.

The virtual Qwerty keyboard is hard to manage with big thumbs but the numeric keypad is excellent, supporting usual T9. This is an upgrade not only of the Tocco Lite but the Tocco Icon, the disastrous model that kept ringing random people in your phonebook and would unlock itself at will. This however is a little slow on internet access but if all you need are the footy results and a bit of news then its fine.

The facebook app is particularly good, the messaging speed particularly. I have ok-to-good (more ok than good) reception in my area and on vodafone UK it works better than my previous Nokia phone. Samsungs are excellent for voice reception, and in these days of worse and worse reception every year, it performs pretty well.

There's conversation view for messages but no picture support for contacts in that view. If you want all that, go for a smartphone and enjoy less than 21hrs of battery life every day lol. But if you like a small handset and you're a one-handed texter this is great. It takes a bit of getting used to without haptic (vibration) feedback on the keys but I soon got used to it.

The email client isn't wonderful and its not a business phone, but my memories of my one and only android phone were constantly being hounded by emails and syncing. None of that here :-)

  • Reply
  • 2012-07-04 22:43
  • 39CZ
  • H

does this phone support hindi typing

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-28 09:54
  • Hkqj
  • U

ths s gud phone nd englsh dctionary is in it...so its gud

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-28 06:13
  • XjeB
  • U

Samsung star 3 is not good because no more options operate in this mobile.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-23 11:28
  • ut5B
  • C

does this phone support pdf files and skype software?

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-22 16:40
  • tYVL
  • Q

phone is not good i don't like samsung star 3 s5222

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-22 06:36
  • vbyV
  • U

very sexy cell.

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-17 14:29
  • t1$A
  • F

boss MP4 r not working so dont buy..

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-16 12:28
  • v{W$
  • C

this mobile is 2 gud but its features r 2 bad

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-13 09:15
  • uttU
  • C

its gud bt not too gud

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 14:01
  • Khv4
  • H

recently I buy this cell, its a very nice mobile but net speed is low and its not capable to play mp4 files!

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 09:08
  • U@ve
  • C

i have problem with touch. It takes time to operate the function. The video clarity is very bad. It doesnot support most of the formats. I am not satisfied with the facilities

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-12 07:43
  • t@5S
  • R

wil it b a gud celfone tu buy .....?

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-09 08:18
  • vwnU
  • Q

> In reply to Prateik @ 2012-01-19 14:05 from vwes - click to readit is good

  • Reply
  • 2012-06-02 11:12
  • tUqG
  • R

nice mobile but not android

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-28 14:45
  • utSP
  • F

Sort by:
Total of 212 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Star 3 s5220.