Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
6.2
- Features
-
5.3
- Performance
-
5.7
- eddieb
- Report
- 0
Great Cell PHONE, easy to use. So far so good. Check back in with you in a few weeks to see if I still feel the same about it. Have a great week.
- Reply
- 2011-09-12 21:17
- jt8p
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this is the only phone with no camera i bought this with out knowing this tried to return it for this reson walmart would not exchange it i just wanted an other phone i feel they should have told me so thank you
- Reply
- 2011-05-23 23:18
- QsNR
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
very slow phone. specially designed for Old age people.
The quality of the phone is also not very good.
- Reply
- 2011-03-09 13:11
- w47D
- H
- lara
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-01-09 00:43 from 4wBq - click to readhow this cell ph is workin
- Reply
- 2011-03-08 10:39
- PDTc
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to anonymous user @ 2010-09-15 21:19 from q2YG - click to readI quite agree with you. This phone would be excellent for the elderly. I hope there's a gsm version of this one, I would get definitely get it for my grandmother.
- Reply
- 2010-11-01 15:20
- wrec
- R
- anonymous user
- Report
- 0
This is a good phone for an older person, someone with poor eyesight, or someone who has trouble with smaller key sizes. The display is bright and uses larger letters and numbers. It also has reasonable battery life.
- Reply
- 2010-09-15 21:19
- q2YG
- H
- Jagdeeth
- Report
- 0
Why use people from the USA still these silly phones?
this kind of phone was cool....10 years ago!!
Even in Biafra there are better phones. shame on you USA. (for the rest i like USA..my family have shops there and sell everything to the people)
- Reply
- 2010-08-25 17:20
- mS7B
- C
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Saroash @ 2010-08-02 16:23 from uWx8 - click to readAre you SB?
- Reply
- 2010-08-04 07:55
- tL$Z
- R

