Samsung U800 Soul b - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.1
- Performance
-
8.1
- Votes:
- 1389
- Hits:
- 394671
- chris
- Report
who can tell me izit tat u800 soul b can support mpeg4 or wma video file????
- Reply
- 2008-12-15 12:59
- ibcP
- Q
- Gremlin1708
- Report
Hey there all... Just want to say that i think the Soul B is a very good phone. Only thing that i have against it is the little lag. My previous phone was also a samsung ,with no lag :-) , and it gave me no problems. I am sure that this one would be the same if not better. Samsung did a good job according to me. Keep the SOUL up :-)
- Reply
- 2008-12-15 07:09
- N9CU
- U
- arun
- Report
which one shall i choose ???
Nokia 5610 or sony ericsson T700 or samsung U800 soul b
- Reply
- 2008-12-15 03:09
- 2SNp
- Q
- Jay
- Report
I'm having hard time choosing which phone should i buy? I'm planning to buy this phone but SE T700 catches my attention... any comments between the two? they are almost identical in specs.. but which is better?
- Reply
- 2008-12-14 11:46
- PApP
- U
- Dunker
- Report
Hi can someone please tell me can you change the message(txt) tone with one of your choice as i know previous Samsungs have been lacking this facility
- Reply
- 2008-12-13 15:27
- nEXM
- U
- manu
- Report
how's the speaker volume via external speakers while listening 2 music is it LOUD enough( comparable 2 nokia 6300) PLEASE TELL ASAP
- Reply
- 2008-12-13 07:45
- vGEC
- Q
- forgivness
- Report
can someone tell me is this fone good enought, i want to buy but i haven"t choosen yet, and how long is life time? pls help
- Reply
- 2008-12-12 15:11
- 0BFT
- U
- boyz
- Report
OK! I'm back, been using this for a month and traded in from HTC touch...
Pros : very light indeed but strong body (never had problem in my jeans pocket!), loud enough with virbration, very stylish, slim enough, functions good enough for me (depends on you, camera's good too
Cons: Unlike smart phones (remember I had HTC Touch) I cant placed permantly or stay my appoinment on the screen, perssing menu to menu kinda slow,not for music lover coz the sounds too 'slim',
Ask me for any enquiry
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 23:12
- RLpn
- H
- farooq ghufran
- Report
hey i m a user of nokia 6120 classic for nearly an year now...shud i buy samsung U800?i m just worried for the sms storage capacity of this cell...else it looks rocking like my 6120...would u guys recommend it to me?
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 16:45
- u1wq
- U
- waleed aziz
- Report
this mobile is perfect and i like it and it s very confortable for me and samsung company had produced a very good mobile ... thank you for sumsung.
- Reply
- 2008-12-10 14:22
- fvxr
- C
- Rajiv
- Report
> In reply to sumedha @ 2008-12-07 17:02 from utx5Some of the features are missing in Indian version. Also, they have mentioned some 5-6 colors but in india only Soul Gray color is available..Overall, the phone is really good.. slim, user friendly.. Camera is powerful and video quality is also good, speaker volume is low compared to my older Motorola e398.. hence overall I give 8/10..
- Reply
- 2008-12-08 10:00
- uWux
- R
- Hindustani
- Report
"Inferiority Complex" nicely blended with "Attention Deficit Disorder" gives birth to the flesh-and-money flashing must-look-at-me attitude. Priced at INR 9,500/_ this phone serves them for whom a cell phone is meant to be shown off rather than used as a communication device.
It did have the potential to be a spectacular telecomm piece. But some weirdo at the Samsung management literally ruined the Indian version -- the U800E. Cost-cutting at the expense of the Indian buyers is definitely not a wise thing to do. Plus, different geography got different mismatches with the published specs. That too is NOWAY fair. As it so happens to be that it seems like Samsung is rushing towards expanding its portfolio while neglecting the very buyers with mismatched specs and horrible pre and post sales support. What I don't understand is how can Samsung even dare bank on neglecting the buyers? After all, there are many alternatives already available in the market! Seems like Samsung is making a deal with the friendly neighborhood car-wash centre years before buying a car. Funny? Fact, actually.
It's a real shame that I bought this phone after knowing the specs at GSMArena. But that definitely is NOT GSMArena's fault. And Samsung India's website itself was throwing the INCORRECT specs at my face. And that IS Samsung India's fault. Co-incidence or deliberate -- must not be tolerated.
- Reply
- 2008-12-08 06:12
- 4nbx
- H
- waleed aziz
- Report
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2008-12-06 17:03 from MZuanice phone
and very good phone
- Reply
- 2008-12-08 00:34
- fvxX
- R
- G L
- Report
> In reply to Hindustani @ 2008-10-29 19:03 from 4nbxHey, after ur 'think before u leap' warning at the beginning, any major warnings now after using it for over a month?
I've had a Samsung D600 for over 3yrs now n it was an absolutely grt buy. My mind was set on the Nokia E51 until I discovered another grt Samsung tat meets my requirements n looks smart.
Do I really have to worry abt the low-tech Indian version of this ph, especially since I don't care abt the 3 negatives you listed abt the Indian version?
And, is the battery life good?
Thanks.
- Reply
- 2008-12-07 22:28
- vGdG
- Q
- Asad
- Report
> In reply to sumedha @ 2008-12-07 17:02 from utx5you wont regret even if you bought it randomly, it is complete phone, for helping you why you should buy this phone
1. the basic that thing depends on your own personalty is the style of phone buy it if you like it, it gives you feeling of something like a cellular phone in true.
2. except smartphones you can compare phones by sound quality(bang oulfsen speaker) 7/10 screen 8.5/10 camera 3mp is among the better ones but its camera is lightening quick. one "needs" a camera phone hardly once a month. great music player with real visualization. software flow 8/10, no hassles in operating the phone customization(themes and like) 9/10 better than nokia and motorola.
buy this for hassle free mobile usage and greats looks internal and external with added quality of good sound and music player.
- Reply
- 2008-12-07 19:41
- u1ut
- R
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed