Samsung U800 Soul b - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.3
- Anonymous
- Report
there are two models of competitors. 6500 and w890.. i think samsung have no chance against the great two manifacturer (S.E. & Nokia) and if you delete the samsung brand and then paste the sony ericsson brand, add "c" & shortcut buttons, nobody cant see the difference. its a cheap copycat of w890 & 6500.
- Reply
- 2008-06-24 00:42
- piwv
- U
- Ric
- Report
How is that with the "b" behind Soul? Is that a Samsung as a high writes or more of a "Soul b"?
- Reply
- 2008-06-22 18:01
- p1xx
- Q
- Anonymous
- Report
Nokia is not even close in build quality and style to Samsung. Never was. Never will be.
- Reply
- 2008-06-21 12:31
- iGfA
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
i think that samsung should have just stated with the slider
- Reply
- 2008-06-14 00:15
- 0FrQ
- C
- Thando
- Report
Wow I adore this phone
Its so slim and thats the way to go
- Reply
- 2008-06-08 09:23
- Na$Z
- H
- Shadowed_angst
- Report
> In reply to Duan @ 2008-06-02 06:16 from wucQI think G700 will be its only competition considering the camera because they both lack autofocus while the rest (KF510, C702) got it.
- Reply
- 2008-06-06 05:28
- 2Ats
- R
- b
- Report
I want to know:
-Does it support sdhc?
-How flat is the keypad? Do I need nails to dig into each number? (like the U300)
-Battery life? Typical 3hr call time for Samsungs?
-Price! :O
- Reply
- 2008-06-05 17:31
- n$en
- Q
- ben
- Report
freeware catalogue for PC http://www.greenbydiamond.com/...reeware.html
- Reply
- 2008-06-03 08:34
- wr6T
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
WAaouuuu ! QCIF video recording at 15fps ! Welcome back ten years ago...
I love Samsung, but for your information Nokia will release mid june the 6220C for 325 euros with VGA video recording at 30fps...
- Reply
- 2008-06-02 21:05
- mDLW
- U
- shadowed_angst
- Report
I hope the production units will have video recording at QVGA or CIF resolution at the least because QCIF is already outdated for mid-range phones.
- Reply
- 2008-06-02 09:37
- 2Ats
- C
- Duan
- Report
Lol @ your comparisons. Com'on men !!! U r comparing this sexy outstanding phone with awful Nokia 6300. No comparison. Hey emotional ppl...dont go for name....just be impartial & compare the looks, features, memory features, camera etc.
If u compare the body, the we can say it competes with Nokia 6500 classic and Sony Ericsson T650. If talk about camera, then its rivals are S.E C702, G700, Nokia N78 and LG KF510.
Get life...dont get emotional to defend that brand which you carry. I m uzing S.E K800...but I m impressed with this phone az well. I ll definitely will try this sexy babe.
- Reply
- 2008-06-02 06:16
- wucQ
- U
- J
- Report
Personally, i find the touch interface a little insensitive at times. No doubt a good camera. However its flash is not powerful enough when facing strong sunlight or in dim light conditions at night. One factor they should improve on would be the volume of the loudspeaker. It is too soft to be heard on a busy street or bus. Sound quality through the earphones are excellent. Sound quality through the loudspeakers lack bass. keypad is great for messaging. large screen makes viewing of photos a pleasure. conclusion: great for photos but not a good option for people whom like to blast music through the loudspeakers and not suitable for people whom often visit crowded and noisy areas.
- Reply
- 2008-06-01 12:59
- F4ps
- H
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed