Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.2
- dilemma
- Report
- 0
Im so confused... dont know which one to buy.. U900 or G810.. i like the touch screen for the navigation buttons but I'm looking for a wifi mobile phone.. =(
- Reply
- 2008-03-13 03:01
- PI0}
- U
- perfect
- Report
- 0
perfect camera!
it crash the g900 camera!
thank u samsung for your powerful cameras :)
- Reply
- 2008-03-12 16:12
- m1uP
- U
- S.SUDHAKAR
- Report
- 0
No QUAD-BAND?. No HSCSD?. No EDGE?. No WLAN?. No GPS?. Then?. Whats the use of buying this phone in this TECH world?.
- Reply
- 2008-03-12 16:09
- upY6
- U
- NOT COMPAREABLE!
- Report
- 0
the preferable designe of G810 is not compareable with N96 designe ! And Also
N96: Standard battery, Li-Ion 950 mAh
G810: Standard battery, Li-Ion 1200 mAh
And Also
G810 has 3x optical zoom, xenon flash,Camera face detection ,.....
where are these Features in N96 ??!!....
- Reply
- 2008-03-12 02:07
- nTKR
- U
- Power of Samsung
- Report
- 0
this is a compare between G900 SE & Samsung U900's cameras(5 MP) :
G900 SE:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showpi...ena_f004.jpg
U900 Samsung:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showpi...ena_f002.jpg
G900 SE:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showpi...ena_f003.jpg
U900 Samsung:
http://www.gsmarena.com/showpi...ena_f003.jpg
Look at the photos to realize the power of samsung cameras & Also the scorn of G900 camera!
- Reply
- 2008-03-12 01:55
- nTKR
- U
- Abhishek
- Report
- 0
If you think nokia phones are big and fat then go through the specifications and see nokia N96 and samsung G810 have exactly same dimensions but the N96 offers a lot more functionality.
- Reply
- 2008-03-11 19:32
- RnpG
- U
- ashraf
- Report
- 0
first i would like to say thanks for samsung design engineers couse in the market never i could not find such models and camara phones are very good clarity.
- Reply
- 2008-03-10 20:32
- pu7Y
- U
- hAppy To hElp
- Report
- 0
To WhichP
If U want Wifi why not look at the G810
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_g810-2257.php
- Reply
- 2008-03-10 16:25
- mpbP
- U
- WhichP
- Report
- 0
No wifi? Oh why Samsung, why! I do NOT want to buy Nokia with wifi as they are so big and fat phones. I am not going to buy a new phone unless it has wifi for browsing the web to kill time. But currently only options available in Finland are those ugly fat Nokias. I want something considerably thinner than N82 for example. iPhone ain't an option here.
Also about spesifications:
- Does anyone know does this have uGo even as an option?
- And is it true that this maschine still don't have multiple ringtoneprofiles? Nokias have so many to choose and configure from, essential to me.
- Reply
- 2008-03-10 09:19
- SqS%
- U
- D Dizzle
- Report
- 0
me wants this phone *drool* it looks so nice and the interface is amazing looking gonna buy when it comes out
- Reply
- 2008-03-10 04:57
- iS5b
- U
- Shahriar
- Report
- 0
Great phone.Great UI.
Samsung is majesty.Like no others and no others can like samsung.
- Reply
- 2008-03-08 20:11
- QKV6
- U
- Paul
- Report
- 0
why can't these guys ever just put 850 frequency on these models??? They would do good selling in the North American market too! Good Game!
- Reply
- 2008-03-08 17:26
- j85T
- U
- Scott
- Report
- 0
This phone should be awesome! I am thinking about grabbing one when they come out (hopefully soon!), be a nice replacement for the D900.
Hopefully they have solved all the small things I don't like.
*Message storage of more than 200 messages would be good
*Ringing Profiles, more than just Silent and Loud.
*And customizable SMS tone.
That would make it a great phone. :)
- Reply
- 2008-03-08 11:17
- PxvC
- U
- woohoo
- Report
- 0
its for video call only.. not a secondary camera,, not able to use for taking photos
- Reply
- 2008-03-07 12:03
- PFM2
- U
- abigail
- Report
- 0
u900 have a front camera for video calls... click here to see the photos...http://www.samsung.co.kr/news/...entid=118960
- Reply
- 2008-03-07 08:03
- RDXJ
- U
- liam skinner
- Report
- 0
this phone will be class im getting it for my birthday wat a brill name
- Reply
- 2008-03-06 21:30
- pKbA
- U
- saveferris
- Report
- 0
Looks like the specs are wrong, IT doesn't have TFT 16M colors. In the first look glance artile it says 262K-color display of QVGA resolution.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsun...ew-225p2.php
- Reply
- 2008-03-06 07:39
- PxvM
- U

