Samsung Vibrant - user opinions and reviews

Samsung

Popularity

Daily interest
0.4%
Total hits:
1658218

Voting results

Design
6.9
Features
7.0
Performance
7.0
Votes:
21


Sort by:

iiiiiiiii cant say about it it is fantabulous

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-04 17:30
  • TL5g
  • U

Samsung have their own OS but they r using android caz they know that their os bada is a Loser

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-04 14:26
  • upaA
  • U

c'mon samusung u r getting boring...

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-04 09:57
  • PBsq
  • C

> In reply to Marcelo L @ 2010-07-02 17:17 from 5KBM - click to readNo, there is a front facing camera, it's so obvious if you put the picture up big.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-04 04:44
  • vuti
  • R

i dont think that phones have to loose on flash just because of measures, personally i do not need 0.0000001mm thin phones, i better prefer thickr but with flash

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-03 23:36
  • qbc4
  • U

Why all the same models? touch screen, 5mp camera, etc...How many models more??

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-03 17:04
  • 3Avm
  • U

It is a pity that it has no "TV OUT" and "long talk time"

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-03 14:13
  • Tmgu
  • C

No Flash! omg!

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 19:31
  • iBtv
  • U

This model does NOT come with a forward facing camera....please update your specifications accordingly.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 17:17
  • 5KBM
  • C

I'm a Samsung fan and this is a nice smartphone with good features but the only problem with SAMSUNG is that they releases phone so quick week by week that there new released phones are getting older week by week and not like Sony ericsson they released phones after 2 months that's why there new phones that are released don't get to much old and that's good bec. if you bought a phone then after that after 1 year your phone will be old bec. of that situation that they released phones to much quick and that's not good news...

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 10:34
  • nxi2
  • R

tell me a different between vibrant and captivate?

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 08:45
  • Mfxh
  • C

> In reply to tq745 @ 2010-07-02 03:24 from 0cU6 - click to readYou can use this phone for night vision too.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 05:07
  • 4$Ev
  • R

this phone doesn't need a flash...it has a night mode. check out the pics on xda, the night mode works great.

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 03:24
  • 0cU6
  • U

> In reply to Jack @ 2010-06-30 10:37 from vuti - click to readI'm agree with you, pal. w

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 02:36
  • fmPj
  • R

Yes sir! By this time I think samsung knows what we exactly need nowZ! I'll send my congratulations for them. w

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-02 02:35
  • fmPj
  • U

remove the name "galaxy" lols

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-01 16:24
  • uSRX
  • C

WTF samsung always put "galaxy" on their phones!?

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-01 16:22
  • uSRX
  • C

another NONSENSE "galaxy s" name! LOL

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-01 03:15
  • t7A2
  • C

> In reply to jj @ 2010-06-29 10:09 from 4vYd - click to readi think it is $200 with 2 year contract

  • Reply
  • 2010-07-01 00:43
  • qKK1
  • R
  • Samsung Galaxy S own
  • Report
  • Rating0

Well, I have a Samsung Galaxy S (8GB, but it's also possible to have it with 16GB, however once Froyo comes up, I will use the external memory more).
What I like:
1. Screen unlock pattern (on a matrix of 3x3 points you can select whatever pattern you want for unlocking the screen, so strangers may have a hard time looking in your phone).
2 Speeeeed.
3 swipe.
4 Great display.
5 Great camera.
5 The "Layers" application (let's you see in space POI's around you).
7 You can play DivX movies "out of the box" (I like this when I travel).
8 Good battery life (due also to economical proc and display).
From android market:
9 Find my phone app.
Minus points:
No web flash in standard browser (but to be solved with Froyo; also there is a android marked browser who has it).

  • Reply
  • 2010-06-30 14:58
  • Am9Y
  • H

Sort by:
Total of 840 user reviews and opinions for Samsung Vibrant.