Samsung X830 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
7.8
- Performance
-
7.8
- Votes:
- 3028
- Hits:
- 1141503
- RKM
- Report
at 350$, i think it is costly than the phones in the same category. But i like the design. better than Moto
- Reply
- 2006-09-14 17:05
- P$x0
- U
- BO
- Report
personally i think that samsung shud have thought about putting 3g on this phone...it looks awesome but with no 3g i won go for it,,,
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 19:07
- GhfH
- U
- nick
- Report
i think this phone is ace...i dont care if the camera is only 1.3...its not intended for that
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 18:48
- iIR0
- U
- nick
- Report
i think this phone is ace...i dont care if the camera is only 1.3...its not intended for that
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 18:27
- iIR0
- U
- MoE
- Report
I will pay 500 dollars RIGHT NOW to get my hands on this piece of art, I cannot wait any longer, I want it badly.
- Reply
- 2006-09-12 10:51
- M{3P
- U
- Dan
- Report
Too bad this phone dont come in baby blue...wud of been nice ...lol...but looks good what is the price i want one, besides i need a new phone.
- Reply
- 2006-09-11 12:42
- PWHd
- U
- xdanix
- Report
WOW this fone is minted!!! it looks well nice in pink!!!x
- Reply
- 2006-09-10 19:29
- nU1b
- U
- EmThor
- Report
omg, this phone knows everything I want, 1gb is more than enough, if u change music, in every 3-4 days, and U can sms and phone it with too, and small and very stylish! hope the battery will last at least 2 days ^^
- Reply
- 2006-09-09 22:02
- nm6m
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
MORE MEGAPIXELS DOES NOT MEAN QUALITY. Bigger sensor size means better quality. Go buy a bloody camera if you all want more 'megapixels'. The sensors used in phones are all garbage, and cramming in more megapixels won't improve anything. Less stupid people, more smart people. Go be an hero. Love /b/
- Reply
- 2006-09-09 21:27
- P%md
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed