Honestly this looks to me a copy!!
If its a goog looking Phone I'll buy it!
For those people care a lot about menu's.I have to say that who will be haning up with the phones 24 hours a day! no one its not a computer!!!
comments about Motorola 's menu useless!
Write a review about this phone!!!
All you have to get from this phone it looks like a copy!! thats all!! HOnest and correct no trahses againts samsung!! All can see its true!! It looks like a copy of Motorola RAZR V3! why you people trash MOTO!!
Why don't you trash the imitator!!
Suxks....V3 Moto ,worst menu worst function!! Samsung Rules....BEST !!
this phone is so cool yet i am only 13. and i dont have it and i hope i get it soon
This phone would have been a perfect phone if there is built in card slot for external memory. A 150 MB is not gonna cut it for nowadays so called media files.
Stop all this nonsense about 2Mpix.
It does not make sence with the physical size of the optical parts...
All you get is more thermic noise. You then need the software to smooth the picture, and ends up with a lower effective resolution...
(Same stuff with compact cameras)
For a 3G phone, Samsung can use a 2 megapixels phone. So far, non of the 3G phone got 2 megapixels from Samsung yet.
I think this phone can do better with 2 megapixels camera. Samsung got a Z510 with 1.3, so y not make this one a 2?
Come on guys...be fair...even this phone looks like V3 but it's far much better and not too far off compares with new V3x.This's the thinnest 3G phone in the market so far(V3x is 20mm thick).Price wise,V3x is too expensive at USD777.00 and keep in mind that price of V3 has been dropping badly(from USD850 to USD300 now),I'd bet Samsung will be much cheaper when come out.Overall Samsung are always builds good quality phones,practical&afforfadle comepares with Motorola....Again to be fair...there's nothing perfect, you guys should give Samsung some credits cos at the end of the day we always comeback to Samsung.I've used 3 V3 for the last 18 months so I known how good they're.
Too bad Samsung was the first to come out with a thin phone.....moto copied samsung and beside the v3 sucks
You are simply stupid ! how can u say that a phone that has a megapixel camera, 3g and a huge memory is worst than razr ?! now every thin phone that is built copies razr ? be serious ...
copy cat alert??
dats yall american could think of..
we come out with better phones..
Look at the enlarged picture.
At the 'top' right, could that be a T-flash slot??
Well It looks like they havn't copied on of the best thing from the v3!
The the antenna doesn't look like being placed by the microphone...
They should come up with a new design @least..i mean i a ss fan but if they do things like these. you seriosly have to think about the orignality of the product.
does anyone know if 3G fuctions can be used on the 1900mhz band cuz in N-A its the only supported band for 3G as no official band has been designated. i know that the nokia 6282 does use 1900mhz for 3G but is there other phone than this one???
Yeah...it might be an imitation of the V3....but...the V3 sucks...menu and stuff sucks....i had it myself..and i know a lot of ppl who had it...and all the same opinion...it sucks...but now...samsung makes one just like it...a good menu and stuff....and ppl can work with samsung...so i guess it will do well....