Siemens M65 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
8.3
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
8.1
- Votes:
- 3002
- Hits:
- 480972
- Darren
- Report
Just got the M65 and I would recommend it. It has great features, such as sound recording and 11 second video. The camera has a 5x zoom. Theres a decent ringtone and vibrate selection. Despite looking a little awkward to use, its easy to handle. Screen is good quality too. Ive had a number of hansets recently and returned them all in dissapointment. This is easily best one I have used.
- Reply
- 2004-07-25 18:36
- U
- angelos Greece
- Report
perfect all in one camera screen and resistance to water,dust and shock costs:179euro
- Reply
- 2004-07-24 12:49
- U
- Tom
- Report
i am also a mountain biker and the nokia 5140 proved to be a waist of time it easily breaks and the tourch on top is ok but i cant wait to get my siemens M65 it seems so much better
- Reply
- 2004-07-23 16:46
- U
- Mike
- Report
Siemens authorized store sold said cellphone and told buyer that it had been configured for MMS, etc. but even after 24 hours said buyer could not use said feature
- Reply
- 2004-07-23 04:59
- U
- Boris
- Report
Useless. Locked up three times in a day and half. It is also extremly slow to do anything! Do siemens test their software?
- Reply
- 2004-07-22 18:37
- U
- taavi
- Report
i have checked my cx65 there is no contrast tool only illumination. i quess its becouse the M65 and the CX65 are the same, but the M65 is shock proof
- Reply
- 2004-07-22 17:14
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
m65 dosnt have conrtast control only illumination so that make less of choice for pictures bright and lightness
do cx 65 have the contrast or what
- Reply
- 2004-07-22 00:44
- U
- Anjum
- Report
No resell value. In Pakistan class 10 GPRS not working (ufone). It hangs up several time during operation. Some times i have to remove battery to reboot. I purchased it from Dubai. Nokia is better 6600. Where is the bluetooth?. My biggest mistake.
- Reply
- 2004-07-20 23:09
- U
- Skater
- Report
The m65 has a better display. It's specialy coated against scratches and also better to see in direct sunlight. The camera is in both versions the same so that doesn't matter. The dynamic lights are on both sides of the top (behind the orange rubber), they will go of by incomming calls, empty battery etc. You can change that by yourself and is a lovely gimmick!
- Reply
- 2004-07-19 19:44
- U
- Ma'en
- Report
we all know that m65 and cx 65 are the same in much things but i want to know which better in display and camera !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2004-07-19 00:27
- U
- skater
- Report
You've like it or not. But one thing is for sure; he's good made and better resistant for dust and things like that then the Nokia's.
- Reply
- 2004-07-15 22:26
- U
- Frank
- Report
I'm a prof mountainbiker. This Siemens M65 resists it all from shocks, sand or dust and most of all water. The Nokia 5140 that i had before was not so tough. After a few month it was broken.
- Reply
- 2004-07-15 08:03
- U
- Paul/Netherlands
- Report
The CX65 and the M65 are basicly the same. Inside they are using the same platform/software. The CX65 is made for the casual types and the M65 for the sporty ones. It's a crime to change the battery on the M65 (you have to disconnect the metal plate). But he's much better then the Nokia (with its stupid light on top). Siemens rules with this phone in the sports segment.
- Reply
- 2004-07-14 11:48
- U
- Antonio
- Report
You must be crazy...i have a M65 and some days ago i tried 5140 and display sucks! Siemens has TFT 65K and nokia only 4096 colors!
- Reply
- 2004-07-14 02:26
- U
- Hunter
- Report
Nokia did a good job whit the 5140...A lot better job than Siemens did whit the M65....Conclusion---Nokia 5140 IS BETTER THAN siemens M65.
- Reply
- 2004-07-13 20:26
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed