Sony Ericsson Aspen - user opinions and reviews

Sony Ericsson

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
0.3%
Total hits:
2377242

Voting results

Design
6.4
Features
6.3
Performance
6.5
Votes:
49

Sort by:

I think its not a better discover according to the Sony Ericsson............

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-03 03:08
  • IP5j
  • C

i think this is another SE attempt which has come too late and too poor spec'd. common guys, do u think 3.2mp is going to be in demand in Q2. not even sure if the low tier group will buy this phone given that mid tier and high tier is going to certainly skip this. Samsung Black Jack achieved this many years ago ... why is SE lagging man! E72 from Nokia is far better in spec and quality. the SE design as usual is boxy just like swedish designs. u've got to innovate if u want to remain competitive. Grow up!

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-03 02:58
  • uCjc
  • U

> In reply to HB @ 2010-02-02 11:44 from m1u{ - click to readMicroprocessor
CPU-Clock:600MHz CPU:Qualcomm MSM7227
RAM:capacity: 256 MiB (accessible: 176.4 MiB)
ROM-capacity: 256 MiB (accessible: 113.3 MiB)

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-03 02:22
  • LA{M
  • R

if the phone is cheap...good start SE...but if its expensive, GOODBYE SE

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-03 00:42
  • PSw1
  • U

I kinda like this phone. looks way better than nokia e63/71/72. just abit diappointed with the screen size and the camera is just 3.2mp with no flash. Bo!
Think, i'll still get LG BL40...

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 23:10
  • PB1v
  • U

screen size should have been 2'6 and there should have been a led flash for the camera...

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 21:45
  • uBFn
  • C

gsm arena review it please. i think this phone deserves one.

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 20:09
  • PSvM
  • U

if cpu will be snapdragon and the price will be around 300 euro then this will be a excellent phone for business

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 20:02
  • njBb
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-02-02 14:06 from uSNR - click to readYeah! Sure! lol

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 19:12
  • LCb9
  • R

what were they thinking, the sony erisson xperia series was much better.

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 19:11
  • 3LA3
  • U

low range camera 3.2,now window os is outdated. symbian and androad os is much good for friendly use

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 18:39
  • vGTa
  • C

it shud atleast have 5 mp camera and xenon flash den it wud be a cool fone

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 17:12
  • 3i2T
  • U

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-02-02 12:39 from iie7 - click to readfast port is gone, engineers working on fast port are all laid off.

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 17:08
  • qPnK
  • R

WOW!!! its a great phone!!! SE rocks!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 17:07
  • 258A
  • H

UI: nice!
Battery performance: Nice!
Specification: Cmon SE! You can do better! You have rivals!!!

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 16:54
  • mj$@
  • C

If i look between aspen and nokia e72 the difference is the camera
so to me aspen is better i don't care about the camera.
aspen has bigger screen than nokia e72 and nice keypad than e72.and nice design than nokia e72

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 16:37
  • fu{R
  • C

omg its such a copy of nokia's design... even the os looks like the n97 home screen... lol losers

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 16:34
  • wgx5
  • U

At last SE is standing up again . i hope X10 will put it back in the top. The correct style ,it will be a hit.

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 16:01
  • nXEi
  • U

very nice.....little be too late..but better come than never...
compare to e71 ? r u kiddin? win mo 10.000 better than crappin symbian e71. This one is better design and feature compare to E71. i have E 71 fyi....
well done SE...u r a pioneer qwerty phone ( P1, M600 )..other can only follow....
but i better get X10....android is the best os for now...

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 15:46
  • UDMF
  • U

the Display Size too small than other Qwerty phone available now,.....I think minimum of 3in Display is better....

  • Reply
  • 2010-02-02 15:44
  • Mfxj
  • C
Sort by:
Total of 1632 user reviews and opinions for Sony Ericsson Aspen.