Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.7
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.7
- Anonymous
- Report
sony ericsson did a good job in the K700 and P900. Whats wrong with SE now with this toy??
- Reply
- 2004-06-30 18:45
- U
- Searchalaz
- Report
i like sony ericsson, but this kind of design is something i don't like. It's better when it's just a brick, they could have put more memory or something..
- Reply
- 2004-06-30 05:11
- U
- niko
- Report
i will never be a fan of sony ericsson. menu is so slow. texting is timid, and scrolling thru the phone book takes forever. i will never leave NOKIA. the user friendliest wireless out there!
- Reply
- 2004-06-29 22:08
- U
- yee
- Report
see k500, is the same, without facking vodafone, and much better design!!!
- Reply
- 2004-06-29 22:03
- U
- kel
- Report
i think u guys shud go to the link tat DMX provides, the other color matching looks nicer, whr i think this color doesnt seems so attracting also, but those in the link are fine.
i think those ppl who dont like this phone shud judge it by its appearance, normally a not tat good looking phone will only cost a little, like N6260, how much do u think it will be? im fr malaysia, guess wat, N7610 cost RM2399, where SE K700 cost only Rm1999, BUT, doesnt mean tat 7610 is better, cost it doestnt hav Infra Red, and as DMX mentioned, the "mega pixel" Nokia seeling is not even better than SE K700's digital VGA camera. & 7610 has NO preinstalled games, my god!
so, how do u guys think? & yea, if for those guys who really wan alot of mp3 u can play, go get urself a mp3 player, if u still wan to play mp3 in ur phone, then just c how long can ur battery last, ok?
- Reply
- 2004-06-29 05:08
- U
- Miguel
- Report
AQMD, if you want a real mp3 player, get iPOD.This phone wasn't made so you can listed to your mp3 collection. I say if the price of this phone is around $250, this'll be a hit!
- Reply
- 2004-06-28 07:15
- U
- AQMD
- Report
Hey guys .. i was an SE fan till now..now i changed my mind..guess y?...SE made a big mistake!! guess?10 mb internal!!good..but no external ..so crap!!And plus mp3 player..this phone only 4 nerds who only like 2 music songs only..cuz every song 3-4mb..lol..this phone suxsss!
- Reply
- 2004-06-28 04:28
- U
- Devil
- Report
This phone sucks, SE designers got headaches from looking at Nokia's 6260 ;)
- Reply
- 2004-06-28 00:01
- U
- MAJID
- Report
hi guyz i just want to ask that y only nokia is providing html browser y dont others i really miss html browser in all other phones like samsung se moto panasonic siemens alcatel etc
i dont like nokia mobiles
- Reply
- 2004-06-27 14:43
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
as a low end should have added FM radio than the MP3 player
- Reply
- 2004-06-27 07:22
- U
- Laxe
- Report
It's not the design that puts me off, it's the colour scheme...red and blue just don't go together imo.
- Reply
- 2004-06-27 01:37
- U
- DMX
- Report
For the link, make sure there is no space after the ".../sonyeric" as it is an error.. so it should say
"..age/sonyeric/k500/...."
- Reply
- 2004-06-26 21:10
- U
- DMX
- Report
BEFORE YOU POST ABOUT THIS PHONE'S DESIGN
http://mobile-review.com/revie...age/sonyeric /k500/pic1.jpg
http://mobile-review.com/revie...age/sonyeric /k500/pic2.jpg
Sheesh... what's the use of placing the links when no one bothers to look at it?..
AS for my rating:
Design
7-the front is alright, just that the back is ugly
Feature
9-it has everything the k700 has minus bluetooth, and this will be priced at about 200euros...
Performance
8-it's not a high end phone, but does have new stuff, only lacks larger memory and nicer screen (mind you, 128x160 64k TFT is good for a phone this price)
Value
9
- Reply
- 2004-06-26 21:06
- U
- Laxe
- Report
Perhaps they will market it as a phone for minors - the way I see it the only possible way SE would consider such a ugly design was to cut costs and sell it to a much more younger audience. Pre-pay perhaps for children?
- Reply
- 2004-06-26 20:41
- U
- mystic
- Report
this phone irritates me. It's horrible and i should say sony ericsson rushed to ease competition but it seems they have made a big mistake in doing so. They are probably lagging behind now. I think they should have taken more time in creating a more attracrive design and then this ugly duckling would have been a cracker. Maybe it's just the color (blue) and the vodafone red which don't coincide or it's just me being too picky. But then this phone ain't so bad. It's features are rather modern and updated. I would buy this phone for convenience not for fashion. Anyway, it's just a thought from me, the mystichrome
- Reply
- 2004-06-26 17:24
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed