Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.0
- Features
-
6.7
- Performance
-
6.7
- slotop
- Report
- 0
I hope, have this model manual select network!! In other side is too bad to buy.
- Reply
- 2005-01-10 09:06
- Sv3V
- U
- Deep
- Report
- 0
I want to know the battery backup and talk time of Sony Ericsson J200. Also mentioned available colour of phone.
- Reply
- 2005-01-07 08:09
- PUEA
- U
- Bhimu Kumar
- Report
- 0
Hi,
I am living in India Pls tell me what is cost
- Reply
- 2005-01-06 05:14
- i4bG
- U
- rombenkz
- Report
- 0
the best handset, very good bgt..
top dech pokonye.. :-)
- Reply
- 2005-01-05 17:49
- PFja
- U
- antz
- Report
- 0
u get 65k color, 9 mb memory, and MMS in samsung x100, all for just $10 more
- Reply
- 2005-01-04 10:23
- PVdN
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
nokia is not a gud company
it concentrates only on looks not on d features....tak for eg d new ph 7280 soooo cooooool in looks....really gud looks but d tak time is only 1.5 hrs
d whole f**ckin tecnology is wasted
DON'T BUY NOKIA TAKE SONY ERICSSON,SAMSUNG OR SIEMENS
- Reply
- 2004-12-29 12:31
- TRd$
- U
- Nainan
- Report
- 0
I recently got this phone as a gift from my girl. Its an amazing phone. It looks so cute. I 've got the white one. the joystick funtions is some thing new, and i thinks its great.
Basically its a great phone.
And above all its dead cheap.
U can trust my word! blindly go for it.
- Reply
- 2004-12-20 19:35
- U
- vasyl
- Report
- 0
The only clever one here is Christ Almighty as not all phones need to be expensive, besides I'm a pro photographer and all those cameras in all Nokias, SEs, Siemenses and so on are crapy, I'mean a good camera is twice as large as a mobile, so how can a good one fit IN a mobile :), you are not discussing political issues of the U.S. but mobile phones, so notice that some of us do not need to spend $1000 to buy one, having said that it's a quite nice mobile :)
- Reply
- 2004-12-18 12:33
- U
- georgina
- Report
- 0
well, it has IR port unlike quite a few mid-class models by various manufacturers. Still looks nice, not as cheap as some Nokia phones. It will certinly find way to it's users - not so demanding ones. Users that need phone to perform basic action - SMS, place a call.
- Reply
- 2004-12-14 15:24
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
hey guys, this phone is a low-cost phone.
if you want bluetooth or a cam look at the other sony ericsson phones!
and to all nokia-fans: look at the low-cost phones made by nokia. they are not better than this one, but ugly.
all low-cost phones are cheap.
- Reply
- 2004-12-10 21:11
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
SE will never superceed nokia ! not in this planet ! that's for certain !
- Reply
- 2004-12-04 21:08
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Sony ericsson is not in front of nokia, and i doubt it will ever, nokia is selling 3x more handsets than sony ericsson every year, ive had a sony ericsson t630 and it was hopless, the cameras on these phones are crap, nokia is so much better than this and so is alcatel
- Reply
- 2004-12-03 06:29
- U
- vam
- Report
- 0
i submit to Christ Almighty's opinion. Maybe all of you should take a look around and you will notice that most of the people are crazy about cheep but stylish mobiles and that because they do not afford expensive stylish mobiles :)
- Reply
- 2004-11-30 18:54
- U
- Christ Almighty
- Report
- 0
You kids are so fucking stupid, not every phone is made to be top of the line. Do you think everyone walks around with a $600 phone? These sorts of handsets are the standard, everyday sort of phones which are given away free with contracts etc. There are always going to be low-end model phones, just as there are with things like cars and computers. Now that I've said that, perhaps you guys will understand why there's no camera, radio, mp3, mms, bluetooth, penknife, coffee-maker, blender, and miniature microwave oven built into this particular model.
- Reply
- 2004-11-25 06:12
- U

