Sony Ericsson K660 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.6
- Performance
-
7.7
- Votes:
- 1992
- Hits:
- 829580
- Sekar
- Report
> In reply to [deleted post]If u want internet then 6120 classic,
but if you want multimedia then k660i
..... U cant compare them at all for one is a feature or ordinary phone (k660i)
the other is a smart but budget phone.
.. But purely internet wise nokia 6120 classic is good.
It has the symbian s60 browser the same as the apple iphone has (safari)
but whichever phone u buy, there is the operamini, which u can download at mini.opera.com.
Operamini is the best mobile web browser in the world and its free ! !
- Reply
- 2008-07-23 13:24
- M@T2
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
PROS: The K660's design is very sleek and it is very easy to use, it has a decent camera and is very lightweight.Buttons are spaced out so it's easy to text.
CONS: buttons a little small and fiddly
every file sent by bluetooth has to be accepted which is a bore if you're doing bulk transfer
no flash unusual, self timer not self timed
- Reply
- 2008-07-23 11:55
- mX$t
- H
- Erick
- Report
> In reply to [deleted post]Dear Kaka, the K660i was designed from the start as an internet focused device and so offers excellent speed for browsing through being HSDPA. The Nokia 6120 Classic also offers. Deciding which one to choose is difficult as both, in terms of superb all-round performance and genuine value for money, are among the best on the market. The only main difference between these great devices is that the 6120 has an excellent Symbian S60 Smartphone Operating System which allows many additional applications to be installed. If you are not requiring making a choice will be very difficult. One thing is certain: you and anyone else contemplating this choice will not be disappointed, whatever you decide. Both are excellent devices. Good luck!
- Reply
- 2008-07-23 11:33
- M@Ti
- R
- bryan
- Report
my phone...ive had it for about a month...and since the whole front is plastic, theres dust INSIDE the screen. how can i clean it?
- Reply
- 2008-07-22 07:45
- kVV}
- U
- Saju
- Report
my k660i is one week old and am very happy with my phone.
pros : sleek design, superb battery life, easy browsing, superb camera, excellent photo software, bright and clear display screen.
cons : no macro mode and flash even being a cybershot one, should have provided a walkman series headphone.
Perfect phone for a man who expect superb camera and sound clarity along with all data management features, also they have priced the phone very decently !!!
i give a 8 out of 10 !!!
a perfect value for money device !!
- Reply
- 2008-07-21 08:37
- PxrM
- H
- SE supporter
- Report
> In reply to N @ 2008-07-19 18:21 from M@T2hi all~~~
my phone now is k660~~~
tis phone is not bad 2 use~~~
can try 2 use~~~
- Reply
- 2008-07-21 03:56
- ibe6
- R
- aldi
- Report
Hi,
this phone is NOT GOOD to me because it has the same single socket for : battery charging, music headset, and data transfer. This is STUPID! I prefer Nokia 6120c, which has separate sockets.
- Reply
- 2008-07-20 09:46
- UDQZ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to ohohs @ 2008-07-19 16:53 from Ui$1Hi,
i meant to say i used to hear complaints from the other end whenever i used sonyericsson phones, that the voice is not clear, especially from a roadside,
or noisy environment , the caller on the other end could not hear me...
Iam not a fan of any brand, i want good product,
money is hard earned...
Thankyou all....
- Reply
- 2008-07-20 06:38
- p$Kx
- R
- mimi' cucu
- Report
> In reply to Sekar @ 2008-07-19 14:30 from p$Kxhmm... actually you arent in SE side. haha..
SE is king of music phone ( with W series).
SE is king with cyber shot.
SE making me...haha.. ok?
kwakkakkakak...
- Reply
- 2008-07-20 03:48
- p$Kx
- R
- N
- Report
K660 is better than my phone now, nokia 3110. Nokia 3110c is so bored, the camera was bad but sound quite good. Anybody can tell K660 about the perfomance to me? Because i want buy this phone 2 months again. Please
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 18:21
- M@T2
- U
- sonyluv
- Report
for those users who have bought the white one, does the color change after some time? i must say ... white looks very attractive!
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 17:12
- TIE7
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
you peeps shouldnt expect this phone to have very good features. after all, it's a $0 phone when bundled with a contract with it at my subscriber.
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 16:57
- Ui$1
- U
- ohohs
- Report
> In reply to Sekar @ 2008-07-19 14:30 from p$Kxreally? i've been using the W810i for 1 year plus. And felt that sony ericsson is quite good. call quality is great. heh.
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 16:53
- Ui$1
- R
- MASADA
- Report
> In reply to sonyluv @ 2008-07-19 13:15 from TIE7No because the headset is the Antenne !
this cable do the connection with the radio
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 16:28
- mwsJ
- R
- Sekar
- Report
Hi everyone...
I used k610i, k550i
k660,
in all the three phones
the outgoing call quality was extremely bad,
especially in a noisy environment.
i now have decided not to use sony ericsson phones..........
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 14:30
- p$Kx
- U
- luvluvsony
- Report
can anyone give comments on the speaker, plz? thanks!
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 13:16
- TIE7
- Q
- sonyluv
- Report
question:
can i listen to the FM radio using the built-in speaker? (without using the headset)
- Reply
- 2008-07-19 13:15
- TIE7
- Q
- Vyomakesh
- Report
I got this phone 3 months back. It really sucks. Camera is worst. Sound is not that much good and not loud as well. The Internet speed while connecting to PC is the worst speed given by any mobile. They have cheated that it is mainly for web. When compared to Nokia it really sucks in internet speed. I think the EDGE class is very lower. But 3G could'nt be tested as India does not have 3G technology yet. So new cell phone buyers dont even try to think about buying this phone if u talk about internet. Sony ericsson brand name will go down if they release phones like this.
- Reply
- 2008-07-18 11:49
- P@8c
- H
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed