Nokia 808 PureView in focus: Interview with D. Dinning
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III review: S to the thirdSony Ericsson K790 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
8.0
- Performance
-
8.1
- Rohan
- Report
- 0
The biggest downer is the video resolution, it is QCIF=176 x 144, what's up with that SE?? I guess I will stick on to my N70 for some time longer!!
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 20:29
- RKqE
- U
- George
- Report
- 0
They won't have with it a memory stick?!
PLZ someone tell me...
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 20:27
- S1s9
- U
- YoungSoze
- Report
- 0
This phone is simply incredible. I was really considering getting the K750, but this phone looks better and has better features. Sony Ericcsson did it again. And the phone is not ugly its just an acquired taste. The phone is a great mixture of class and style. Its not a phone for the extravagant, but for the modest who prefer brains over braun.
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 20:19
- jSxT
- U
- San
- Report
- 0
Such a great phone.though...!
joystick!!!
small screen size!!!
etc....
however i gotta say that no phone can take better pics than SE does HOWEVER lol again! pics are NOT the main thing people look for in cellphones.
I STAND BY FOR WHAT I HAVE SAID A WHILE AGO IN SE PAGE WHICH IS : N80 from NOKIA is still the best or will be in markits....................it has what both K790i,K800i have.
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 18:55
- jrfV
- U
- criisti
- Report
- 0
and not to mention their wonderfull screens that have....older model Nokia 7650 had a better screen then the new SE phones......
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 16:37
- nygJ
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
this phone sucks big time...what the hell is up with that joystick?!can't se learn something from the other companies....it's not enough that their phones suck,camera sucks on all their models that they have, to be ugly as well...keep up the good work se,this way other brands don't have to worry about competion.in actual tests SE failled to Nokia and Samsung(models tested:SE K750i,N90 and D600);i have tested the models myself,and fist off the pictures up=loaded on this site are BULL&^$^,they have nothing in common with the real deal,but i guess that is a price to pay when testing prototypes,further more this k800 may have 3.2mpx but the results again will awufull.i do not expect that somebody from this paige to agree with cuz it's the SE page and all,but se sux big time
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 16:34
- nygJ
- U
- Farhan
- Report
- 0
can any1 plz tell me whts
WLAN...
and whts is it for..
and the function of WLAN
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 16:25
- Px0a
- U
- Dreadnought
- Report
- 0
Well, fantastic camera according to specs. Looks awful though, non quad-band and no EDGE. But still nice...
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 16:16
- niAc
- U
- CELLUCOM MOE
- Report
- 0
Yeah it a good mobile but we dont have yet her in cell ucom dubai we are located at mall of emirates.
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 15:51
- SkE9
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
function is nice. but.. No wlan is a pity.. i wouldnt buy a no-wlan phone.. pity though.
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 15:27
- RWuw
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
the only thing holding this phone back from being better from the k800, is its lack of a secondary camera. other than that its wonderful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 15:22
- TgvV
- U
- gaurav
- Report
- 0
what about the speakers ?? are they stereo?? what about the headset???
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 15:16
- U2H1
- U
- hanii
- Report
- 0
I don't know what to say,maybe excellent maybe perfect I don't know,but I know one thing (keep going sonyericsson).
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 14:43
- iFr6
- U
- Rohan
- Report
- 0
Really great phone, looks great, but what the heck is a joystick doing here, why can't SE drop the idea of joystick??
- Reply
- 2006-02-28 14:26
- RKqv
- U
