Well i think the winner is sonyericsson k800i too, you can clearly tell by looking at the pictures. I also noticed that, even sonyericsson k750i takes better pictures than nokia n80 on macro mode. just look at the pictures closely.
if Gsm Arena will do a test, the should do this if it will happen for us to decide which is the best camera phone:
NOKIA N80,N93,N73 Vs.
SE K800,K790 Vs.
Benq-Siemens EF91 Vs.
If these will happen, maybe it will start a world war from these giant companies in market right?
LOusy JOYSTCIK are phone lik Nk3230..
I use mine W800i fer 1 years now.. NO problem..
Nk3230?? I use 3 mths it start to jam and ya have to push a lot of times before it go to the direction ya wanna..
*AGREE* wid "STRIKER"..
SOmeone said Sony Ericsson aim at a age range wen design a handset.. I Totally AGree..
Unlike NOKIA which expect eevryone to buy..
Yes, viperkid is a blind nokia fan, with his perfect, beauty, lighter, thinniest 3250 (for me this phone is rubbish)
N80 belong to other phones class, K800 is only great imaging phone and GSMARENA confirm this statement, the buggiest N80 belongs to business class.
The phone that can compete with K800 will be the N73 CZ powered, i really want to view the comparison between K800 and N73
Ha ha ha ha I see nothing changes around here....Viperkid, still hanging around the SE forums taking any opportunity to bash SE phones and go on about Nokia's....
Well Viperkid, it's clear from your comments that you've read GSM Arena's comparison of the K800 and the N80 and managed to extract the only aspect that comes out in the N80's favour - the video capture.... Although it seems the N80 that you've been championing for so long ain't the "wonder device" you've been making it out to be.
Funny, I seem to remember that months and months ago I tried telling you that SE would have a serious competitor for the N80 by the time Nokia got around to releasing it......And would you accept it????? No.
And as far as performance, durability, software response and general bugginess goes, I think we both know which is gonna come out on top there too.....time will tell I guess..... And by the way, below, you say the design is BORING and UGLY. Yet further down this thread, 2006-03-05 to be exact, you say it's a copy of the 3230...does that mean you're actually bashing you're beloved Nokia?
this model will b d 1 of d best camera phones available this year BUT the design is very BORING and UGLY! plus d lousy joystick, i bet that joystick won't stay long, max 5 months and BOOM not WORKING... also d video capture is ONLY average..
lol...the thing about SE is that they AIM for specific groups for different phones...their marketing plan is better than nokia...thats wad i think...nokie is making phones without aiming and is sumthin like they EXPECT most ppl to buy the phone...
ive look this k800 in depok mall at SE exibition, honestly, i really dissapoint about the design, k750 look much better, but, ibelieve, this k800 have something to beat all their competitor, like trium etc2 hihihi..
The shape has been taken from the Nokia 3230i, but then again if U go to see Nokia, feel so threatened, by SE at tht moment that they have gone and released the N73, which is based in similar lines.....
Why is it being compared to the N93? If U look a little lower you will find a copy of it called N73. It has everything that this phone has, and does the same too. Does this mean that the new SE's offerings are way better that the rivals they go up against?
i would go for k800 rather than nokia n93, because n93 will be release at least one year later than k800, by the time n93 released, SE will have another newer and more advance model available in the ,arket
I just read the 3 mpx camera review. This device truly is a great camera-phone, even in it´s beta firmware. But the N80 was a positive surprise too, it was better in video capture and was better than the K750i even though it lacks auto-focus...
Once the price of SE K800 is announced everyone will know what to choose. If its price ranges between 500-650 US dollars, consumers will accept the difference in the features with respect to other mobile phones (especially Nokia), since UPnP WLAN and high resolution video camera won't be that of importance to a great deal of people. Otherwise Nokia will be a better bargain.
Hmm.. 1st, Nokia design is reali bad.. Believe it or not.. Accept the facts or not..
Tat not my problem.. They got good function.. But they dun have design..
They can be better in fucntion and such..
But i believe more ppl go fer "STYLE" wid multi-pack function..
Seriously let compare the phone that have been release now..
Would ya buy N90 or W800i??
N90 is lik twice the size of a w800i..
W800i aim at the age range of teenage who are into MP3 and "STYLE"..
N90 aim at ppl who lik to tok into a "BRICK"??
If ya ppl notice.. SE produce Hp wid a aim..
However i have to agree tat SE and NK produce a lot of similar handset..
I dint say it is bad to have a wider choice..
Wont ya be angry wid ya change to "A" and later a few weeks later "B" come out wid the same function + Additional function.. And look nicer and around same prices??
Example will be..
SE k750i.. w800i..