Sony Ericsson M600 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
7.7
- Features
-
7.5
- Performance
-
7.6
- Votes:
- 5654
- Hits:
- 1751849
- Mayur
- Report
it being to be a sexy phone i would definetly like to buy it in future
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 21:33
- PFHM
- U
- bluhblapaki
- Report
when i first set my eyes on this sleek phone i though this will be exelent... but! it is not it has flappy pannel keys which i hate because i have that in my vanquish db9 and it dosent even have a camera and low memory in all my buisness years i have never been appaled and i will not buy this phone
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 20:20
- pYBP
- U
- Rosco911
- Report
Probably the reason of not putting a camera is to make the cellphone more afortable, or maybe because many bussines are prohibiting the used of camera cellphones.
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 18:37
- 45Wb
- U
- Stop Moaning!
- Report
The person below has made a very good point indeed.
For all you guys moaning about no camera, i have a simple solution for you - just choose another model! If you want a 3G PDA type device with a camera, look at the P990 or the Nokia E Series, it's common sense the manufacturers will release phones without certain features, you have to cover every angle, and believe it or not, not everyone wants to take pictures with their phones.
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 18:04
- MSNt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
I for one am thrilled that somebody is coming out with a high end phone that isn't trying to be a camera.
When was the last time you went shopping for a digital camera and you couldn't find one without a crappy phone attached?
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 17:44
- jH6D
- U
- Habib
- Report
Nice Bussiness Device With No Camera.I Think P800 Is Back In M600 Format :)
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 17:12
- PVtH
- U
- pikanikki
- Report
Wow! this is a masterpiece at last sony ericsson has proved to the world that they are the king of phone production. After the ever green P900 and P910. here is another technologically advanced phone. Good job. hope to see and use better ones
- Reply
- 2006-02-10 14:01
- mJZe
- U
- MeanMachine
- Report
i dun know y the hell the SE guys dint put a camera in m600. i think it wud have been the best phone ever only if it had a camera (a must feature for 3G ....obvious reasons). so i wud rather buy p990. It has the Business card scanner option also.
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 21:48
- Rxxt
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
the phone has to be low priced otherwise it wont work.im a big se fan im using w550i but this phone is a let down it lacks radio,camera,edge.it looks good.atleast it should have had 1.3mp camera n radio.business wise is good.
DISAPPOINTED...
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 19:49
- nHKI
- U
- bari
- Report
why dont sony erisson try makeing a phone better then p990i such as a TV device
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 11:23
- ShJW
- U
- jo
- Report
well well trying to defend SE. but accept it, the nokia E-series are WAY better in software and hardware capabilities, and design, lots of people were complaning about the E61 not having a camera now they are defeding SE. so whats the matter now? every company have them capabilities, SE its good at camera and mp3. but that its. they are not perfect and they ar making theirs mistakes. AGAIN >< lets not bring on the (low end castastrophe) which are underrated really O.o
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 08:57
- Pv9c
- U
- vishal
- Report
its lookin damn good yaar, but is there anybody knows, why it is called a communicator? plz reply y some phones r specially called as communicator?
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 05:23
- UqrW
- U
- sticko
- Report
i am fun of nokia but i can say this m.p. is apsolutely everething that i want.smartphone,touchscreen,qwerty,and no camera.what will be the procesor of this baby?maybe 314 mhz ?!
- Reply
- 2006-02-09 00:26
- Sw0j
- U
- Nick Evgeniev
- Report
No edge. no wifi. weights more than 100g.. is't a brick from 90's?
- Reply
- 2006-02-08 23:41
- mu@f
- U
- P888
- Report
Actually, the M600 follows a lot of the concept of the Nokia 9300 when it was first introduced. No wifi and no cam and smaller form factor compared to the Nokia 9500, whereas the Nokia 9500 had both wifi and cam (like the P990).
Also, looks like a lot of folks out there are complaining about the lack of a camera.
Do you think it will be a possibility that SE may produce an add-on camera module (of reasonably small size) that will be video call capable as well taking normal snaps and recording video? This way, it would make things more flexible in the sense that where cam phones are not allowed, you just don't use the add on cam. When you want it, just snap it in. Much like the camera module for the old T68i.
SE left out the camera to probably keep the price down. So, an add-on cam would make more sense.
As for the missing wifi, holy cow! That i can't forgive. You can't even add-on wifi even if you wanted to! At least most of the other smartphones running Windows Mobile which doesn't have wifi built-in still lets you have the option of slotting in a wifi sd card.
I guess SE also left out wifi to keep the price down. But aren't wifi hardware getting cheaper and cheaper nowadays? And wifi is getting so common nowadays, it's beginning to be taken for granted. True, it has 3G, but the charges are expensive. And have you ever heard of a free 3G hotspot? Can't have such a thing, but you can have a FREE wifi hotspot! Even if you gotta pay, wifi charges are still cheaper than 3G (at least where I am from).
- Reply
- 2006-02-08 19:14
- TC%9
- U
- jlowe
- Report
It makes sense that there is no camera. I mean if Sony is wanting to give RIM a run for it's money, they have to make a product that will do it. None of the Blackberrys have cameras due to the fact that the Fed. Gvmnt. isn't allowed to have cameras in the majority of the Gvmnt. agency buildings. And since our Gvmnt. has a huge contract with RIM, it makes complete sense. The only thing I would have liked to see it have is for it to be EDGE compatible for those companies that don't yet have UMTS.
- Reply
- 2006-02-08 16:16
- 4RjX
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed