Sony Ericsson T280 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
6.9
- Performance
-
7.1
- Agelos
- Report
And stop comparing this phone with all the Nokia Classic craps!!!Its quality is better(alluminum front side not a plastic one)!!!!
And stop be so maniac fans of Nokia...
GET A LIFE!!!!
SE RULES!!!!
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 17:07
- SwAV
- U
- Popocatepetl
- Report
EXACTLY Agelos
Maybe some Nokia owners could be satisfyied if SE was able to release a 10MP cam phone for 50 euros.
GOSH! This phone is for it's use, ok? Cheap and with good quality. OVER!
And as Agelos says, SE has an excellent phone for every use!
SE rules!
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 17:00
- SwAV
- U
- Agelos
- Report
Hi guys!
Just think what you say!This phone is a cheap phone just for the basic use(calls,sms,radio...)!It's not a walkman,mp3 player or cybershoot cam!
If you want a cam just buy k850i,if you want a smartphone you can buy P1i and if you want mp3 players SE has a lot(w880,w660,w610,w580,w910 and more) with the sound quality that only SE can give you(cause of SONY master of the sound).
So,i say that this phone is just for the basic use...some people does not want all this craps that we "tech maniacs" want from a phone!!!!
SE RULES ! ! ! ! !
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 16:54
- SwAV
- U
- TAKIS
- Report
All the Nokia funs are here to put SE into the cave. C'mon guys! Leave SE to do her job and tell to your company to start making phones without problems!
SE rules!
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 16:04
- SwAV
- U
- TAKIS
- Report
This is a basic and cheap phone, without memory card, that means that the 1.3MP camera is awesome! It seems to have good construction. don't blame it before you see the price!
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 16:02
- SwAV
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
WTF is up with SE and coming out with all these crappy basic phones. thats what motorola is for.
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 02:38
- jBLY
- U
- Kevin
- Report
SE is failing now. This phone suck. 1.3mp? Whats the matter with SE? What happen to the phones with better camera quality and autofocus?
- Reply
- 2008-01-25 01:01
- 4}ug
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Low specs ugly cell phone. SE is going down without any high-end phone.
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 22:04
- 4Bbn
- U
- Dani
- Report
its only a Budget phone..the competitor for this a Nokia 3110 Classic
this is better
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 18:53
- nEwT
- U
- koolboywingston
- Report
this phone is good bad AND .....UGLY..............
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 17:53
- PEqe
- U
- giggles
- Report
Yeah, and why every one newest from the T-seies is so useful
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 17:10
- m{jB
- U
- ramr
- Report
SE, back to the drawing board... or to the bat cave, perhaps.
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 16:52
- vxpg
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Those phones are for people who can't afford a expenisve phone...SO STOP COMMENTING about its features.....if u have money and posibilities comment on those for you.....
- Reply
- 2008-01-24 14:13
- pkhr
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed