Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.4
- Features
-
7.2
- Performance
-
7.3
- Anonymous
- Report
sorry Angry what i meant was 4096 from SE and 65k from nokia like you said. he he cheers mate!
- Reply
- 2004-12-27 19:10
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
hey Angry! you really think 65k from SE is better than 4096 from nokia? man oh man you sorry SOB! you know what? you can ram this phone straight up your ass. it has good friction apart from colours.
- Reply
- 2004-12-27 19:08
- U
- heeeeeee
- Report
ok phone but would have been better if it had 65k color screen.....the most stylish phones are from Samsung.....sony catchup fast else koreans will swallow you
- Reply
- 2004-11-26 10:48
- U
- Why SE?
- Report
Why the blah would you want to release this phone now? It's a couple of years too late.
- Reply
- 2004-11-23 10:16
- U
- ANGRY
- Report
hey people out there SE 4096 colors are about or better than nokia 65k colors
shame on u saying nokia better
- Reply
- 2004-11-17 09:37
- U
- roonroon
- Report
My dear SE, you shall market this young brother of T230, to the villagers, low tech, cheap, just talk and traditional message, that's all
- Reply
- 2004-11-11 00:01
- U
- seng
- Report
ok, i accept that this phone is consider to be a low-end one but this is too far low-end!
- Reply
- 2004-11-10 06:41
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
hmmm... i think nothing is special in this phone compared to t230 except 4 the handsfree. n one thing is the best in t230, it has 1mb of memory.
- Reply
- 2004-11-05 13:41
- U
- Nokia
- Report
This is a sony ericsson t230 with a different faceplate, this one i think is more budget than the t230, sony ericsson make better phones or ship out
NOKIA FOR EVER!!!
- Reply
- 2004-11-05 05:01
- U
- ataky
- Report
just look the same as my t230 i dont juse it any more it was a nice low budget phone just like this only this 1 got great design colours but im happy with the f500!
- Reply
- 2004-10-28 21:36
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed