Sony Ericsson T300 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.7
- Votes:
- 2313
- Hits:
- 270235
- Samsuddin
- Report
Go for T68i, the software and resolution is better. I used the T300 to read SMS and it takes long or slow to respond. The shape and design of T300 is odd, I used the MCA-25 camera on T68i and picture turn out better than T300. If you can afford a bit more, go for T68i unless.....
- Reply
- 2002-12-19 01:03
- U
- stooey
- Report
I have had this phone for a few weeks now and whilst the software and applications are great - the actual phone housing in pants - to the extent that i pulled the phone out of my jeans the other day and the bit of plastic at the bottom where the battery cover latches into snapped in 2 - had to resort to super glueing it back on - not great but still works i suppose!!!!
- Reply
- 2002-12-18 16:57
- U
- albert-geert
- Report
the sony ericsson t300 is an very cool and phone it is very easy to youse
- Reply
- 2002-12-16 16:24
- U
- Geert
- Report
I bought this phone about 3 hours ago. And i am still excited. This phone is really great. With a lot of options. Maybe there is need for a better resolution screen but i like it very much. The games are also nice.
- Reply
- 2002-12-11 23:20
- U
- skyscraper
- Report
We bought this phone 2 weeks ago, and like it very much. It' s easy to use, the
joystick is an excellent idea. The only problem we experienced is that we had to
charge its battery until now every 2-3 days, which is not very impressive,
although stand-by time should be 300h, talk time 7h.
- Reply
- 2002-12-03 16:18
- U
- Jakov
- Report
help:this phone does have infra red,but not bluetooth.it is smaller then nokias 3### and it does have colour screen.screen is good,because you will never actually use all 4096 colours of nokia-it is yuct not possible.vhat does java means?it means that you can download fun new games and aplications,and this phone supports a cind of java(not java).you will be able to take over aplications,but they will allways be in your games menu.because of that small java thing phone costs 100$ less.mca-25 is better than mca-20/10,and you can add funny efects to your pictures.this phone is more for younger people(teens) and it has evrything they need.if you are a buissnies user then you may buy nokia9210 or s.e. t68i.new atractive covers for this phone are comming out!!!
- Reply
- 2002-11-26 05:04
- U
- Morpheus
- Report
This phone looks like a brick! It's ugly and it's something you sholdn't buy except if you are blind, so you won't mind it's design.And, Martin, I don't post my e-mail becouse i don't want some boring asshole's (like you) mails in my inbox!
BTW, SonyEricsson is a shit!
- Reply
- 2002-11-25 00:30
- U
- Martin
- Report
How come people can't stand for what they say? They're all 'oh, SonyEricsson is shit' and all. But they're too afraid to post their e-mail addresses. Why?
- Reply
- 2002-11-23 23:55
- U
- nader pakbaz
- Report
hello i want abut more ericsson new from R310s new model buy nader
- Reply
- 2002-11-22 02:37
- U
- T300
- Report
I recentlt bought the T300 bundle with MCA25 camera is only cost S$198 with 2 yrs contract comparing to T68i at $398 without camera and also 2 yrs contract. It's a good buy because everything almost the same except T300 without bluetooth but compensate with the Polyphonic tones. The only big difference is the design of the phone, very individualistic.
- Reply
- 2002-11-22 02:29
- U
- stooo
- Report
I like the look of this phone - especially with the uk price of £199 with the camera bundled - however am also interest in the siemens c55 due to the features and the very good price - any advice peeps?
- Reply
- 2002-11-15 18:49
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Can I just say that the Carphone Warehouse SIM-free phone does not have the camera either!!!!!
- Reply
- 2002-11-14 19:45
- U
- Vinícius
- Report
Does anybody know if it's possible to put any acessory in this phone for it to work with Bluetooth?
- Reply
- 2002-11-11 05:04
- U
- Misty
- Report
£179.99 sim free at Carphone Warehouse
Got one today, looks cool, amazingly easy to use, poly rintones are great
- Reply
- 2002-11-10 05:02
- U
- Michael
- Report
So far so good. Pictures are fairly good when viewed on a PC. Sound seems good. Easy to use. I have only had it for a day so it will be interesting to see how is holds up over time.
- Reply
- 2002-11-09 22:42
- U
- Jim C.
- Report
Nice phone for the money. BUT don't be fooled into believing this is a T68i in a cheaper case. While the enclosed camera, polyphonic ringtones and very low price are outstanding, it is lacking a number of key features. First: WHERE IS VOICE DIALING?? I had that feature on a T28W over two years ago. It's not on this phone! Second: Why is there no calendar? How difficult is it to make a calandar like the T68? Third: What happened to the smart battery info? Now when I move the slide down, it only tells me the date, profile and (this is really rediculous) the model: T300. No kidding. Even on the T28, it told me how many minutes of battery life was available. This I missed when I used Nokia and it's really sad it's not here. Fourth: Why can't I edit what fields I want in my contacts?
On the positive side, the feel of the phone is actually better than the T68i I had. The T68i felt fragile. The T300 and it's joystick system seem more rugged. Time will tell. Yes, it's a bit bigger and heavier but looks like it will wear better over time.
I will probably never get over the fact that I can't voice dial with this phone! It's a step sideways and in a few ways, a step back.
If you want all the features, save your $$ and buy a T68i.
- Reply
- 2002-11-08 17:38
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed