murail, i was referring to the w200 in what was saying in my post and i believe that the w300 is a much better choice!
If you don't mind with the lack of bluetooth, go ahead, I 'think it's a nice phone, but I prefer Nokia 5200, cuz it have much more options and functions...
But you are talking about VIVO gsm?
If it is, I think it worth... =)
I don't care if this phone is sh*t, im still buyin it because im so damn cheap!
It really is a Fantastic phone, But it should have bluetooth,
Other than that its a class phone.
Stupid SE, just using M2 is a way expensive... this cellphone could surely become a hit if used a MS pro duo... pro duos are a way cheaper, it worths much more to buy a k750 and upgrade it to w800, here in Brazil a k750 is about U$ 280
QUESTION: 5 dollars on the 35 min plan here in brazil.. to be used as a secondary phone.. my needs: light, reasonable pretty, long lasting batts and mp3 for chillout times..
Worth buying it?
i have some questions arun
is the screen really bad??
how are the pics taken in extended mode??
how much would it cost without bill?? in delhi,india
how is the sound quality compared to other walkman phones?
when u receive messages and you read them,do they appear in small font or slightly larger like in k510i
thanks in advance
then tell me first-
1.hows d sound quality?
2.how is d display?
5.is it worth buying .
i just wanna know..
is w200 better than w300 which has a bluetooth??
w300 which is cheaper than w200 in indian market would be a better choice??
one of the users said..
it feels and looks cheap, looks like a toy. The screen sucks and these new headphones that replace the HPM-70 ones are truely dreadful!!
is it so??
awaiting your response..
ok guys... do u really need to know about w200i. i bought the phone and i have it now.
ask me about w200i.... and i reply u as it actually is.
rithik roshan in the add,marketing w200i...thts huuuuuuuuuuuuuuugggggggggggggggggeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee....this mobile is surely a hit now..dont worry SE :)
If you have a w300 now then please, dont upgrade to this phone! I just bought it instead of the w300 and its terrible! It feels and looks cheap, looks like a toy. The screen sucks and these new headphones that replace the HPM-70 ones are truely dreadful!!!!!!!!! The only plus side is that the music player is still very good, BUT ONLY WHEN YOU PLUG YOUR OWN SET OF HEADPHONES INTO THE INCLUDED ADAPTOR as the included ones are dreadful!!!!!!!!!!!!! Camera is not too bad actually considering the price but apart from that and the music player the phone is dreadful, buy the w300 much much better!
As far as i know tfts are better quality and brighter than ubc. It is more expensive though. This makes phones having ubcs a lot cheaper.
I have a w300. Does this have better sound quality, mega bass? Is the camera quality better or same, as w300 has an interpolated 1.3mp camera.
Was thinking about getting this phone, however, you can buy the w300 for slightly cheaper than this model now (the w300 has been out for a year now, but its features trounce this model as it has bluetooth and its got the same walkman player on it, and its a flip top phone. However, the camera on the w300 is no better than the camera on this one). Personally i would buy a w300 before they stop making it as the w200 doesnt look to be a good buy at its current selling price, whereas buying a w300 would give you the benefits of the same walkman capabilities (ive used a w300 before, the walkman is amazing) and with features that are missing from the w200 for less!