Sony Ericsson W660 - user opinions and reviews

Sony Ericsson

Pages: 12…2627 28 2930…3233

This phone is the bea's knees..
Awsomely ReTrO..
Shame they left out the flash.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-22 02:45
  • PP@6
  • U

great design. 2MP is ok but why it has no flash or LED light?

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-22 01:44
  • RNCa
  • U

l@@ks awsome!!!!!!!!!!! thanks se!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-22 01:03
  • myYa
  • U

you ppl dont understand what And1 says about having a walkman and a camera phone, well if you have some promblems with SE, just dont buy it..if you like nokia then go on..its not a sin to have a suggestion but some ppl here take it very seriously...there is no perfect cp for all you know, like ppl who always wanted to be perfect but in the end it will always be a shame one..and one more thing if you want better one then buy one who suited to your personality and style, and be ready for the cost...be happy for what you have and dont compare it coz you will be sorry for the rest of yourlife..hmmmpppp

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-21 16:29
  • whBu
  • U

You're right. For me SE is realistic. If you want a phone then that's it! If you want a camera then buy a camera instead. From the technical point of view a phone-sized camera would only need 2Mp. How can they put a big sensor if the the size of a camera is small? 2mp is well enough to produce a good picture provided the sensor is big enough to capture a true 2mp picture size. I suggest we read about digital photography so we will know about the no. of pixels in relation to camera sensors. For me W660 is a good phoen based on its specifications.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-21 11:56
  • S1N1
  • U

What is wrong with a 2MP anyway? So many of you are complaining it's too low, it's too low.. But I get the feeling that it's because you just want the security in knowing you have the highest quality camera available. Some people - like myself - don't need a 3.2 MP camera or a 5MP camera.. 2 MP will do me just fine. I, like i'm guessing would be the majority of users, won't be printing out photos on big A3 sheets. 2MP is enough to fill the screen of a computer with great detail. As a matter of fact, I would not purchase a phone that had a 3 MP camera, simply because the camera would then jut out of the phone (see N93, K800i, etc). For those who DO want a 3 MP camera.. Go out and sacrifice the shape and size of your handset for such a feature. THAT is why this walkman handset is not a walkman 3MP camera. Because that would defeat the purpose of a walkman phone where shape, size, sound and cost are more important, with the younger generation who would buy these phones not all looking to pay the extra cost of an upgraded camera.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-21 01:23
  • PP$8
  • U

i like se but now all the new walkman phones are something that look like w810i. the only differnt walkman phones i see is w850i and w900i. if they switch the design around it might get higher ratings. and the camera~ i agree WHY 2MP!!! its always that and it doesnt even have autofocus now... the older walkman have autofocus... a little improvement is needed

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-21 00:53
  • kDH8
  • U

i think SE was some how testing their customers and see what they need from SE it's a phase that SE going throw to gain the trust of consumers around the world i'm sure all SE fans will be greatly surrprized in the next few months there will be more smartphones more PDAs and ofcourse with good designs and less problems

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 18:18
  • nCNp
  • U

Look Mr. AGC we r the market here, each opinion from us should be taking allot of interests from the SE , the company should not separate their strategy from the consumers taste !!!
I know there is a strategy in the market that SE working on it , but they should at least change the rotten style of there phones that they used to do since years ago ...
We r consumers, we can make company failed or success , there is many examples in the market from other brands like Nokia!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 15:39
  • Sdqj
  • U

really really good explanation and1, very well said...hoping everybody who have a negative comments about all SE phones have enlighten their mind..

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 15:25
  • whAs
  • U

syed shahzaib zaidi

hello, let me explain to you. the reason why walkmans have 2mp because its just walkmans.
its really built for music, not for camera.
if they put a 3mp on a walkman, who will buy a cybershot like k800i, or k810i? everybody will go for the walkman 3mp. so you see its business strategy, and to survive with your business you have to spread your assets in all of your products. if they make a walkman with 3mp, it will not produce them any better. yes its good for that phone because everybody will love it, but how about your other products?? nobody will buy a cybershot because there is already a walkman-cybershot...the business will go down.
thats why SE made a cybershot brand for camera lovers, and walkman brands for music lovers. and i agree with SE, no problem with me. you just have to think wisely for the customer and buisness, you just cant let your company go down just to please the customers. thats not the way to run a business, you have to think of both sides. you want a good camera? then buy a cybershot. you want a good music? then buy a walkman. just as simple as that.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 08:36
  • 2AnI
  • U

I agree with you Mr. Borat...i also don't understand why is S.E. keep realising the same featured phone.And with 2MP!!??the cam is not as good as the W810i, this phone cam's pixel is 1600x1200pixel, slightly lesser than W810's 1632x1224pixel.And i'm still waiting for SE to come out with a 16M color display, y cant SE upgrade it?Do anybody have an excuse for that?

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 07:35
  • ibH@
  • U

AGC

that's the reason why SE's market is growing rapidly and is the fastest growing mobile phone company in the recent years. they really has the strategy and i really admire SE and it's phones since T68i and i can't think of any reason to go to other brands unless SE has never been established.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 06:54
  • 2A3m
  • U

the phone look very nice also with color but walkman phone should be have wifi also, moreover, the appearance for sony it look like the same, should be design it diferrent way of the appearance.

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-20 02:07
  • PI6M
  • U

if the price will be under 350$ i'll buy it, beautiful but not fully loaded with techs

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 21:27
  • nCNM
  • U

IF it costs 50000forint (250dollar)
I 'll buy it.
looks great in black

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 14:41
  • nH1P
  • U

hello every body this is very good set in all aspects but i have an abjection about the camera why sony ericssion not giving 3.2 mega pixxal camera in its 'walkman' series. i think they are making us fool about to waste money on different version thats not fair w880 has been released but sitll the cam is 2.o mega pixxal i think you people will agree with me

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 14:36
  • P%@2
  • U

Dear all any body of u can tell me the prize of this set in dollers ....and will any one of u use it or not ....and tell me that its casing can be change or not ....and why sonyericsson not using the 16M colour....please some one of u tell me

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 10:07
  • PxKj
  • U

the best mobile in the world

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 05:52
  • M{3N
  • U

some of you says other brands is better cos they have it all, camera w/ flash, 3G, edge, mp3 player like other brands do.. but the real fact is No.. nothing really compares to the sound quality of walkmans. and nothing really compares to camera quality of cybershots. thats is why other brands is putting it all together in one HP to stay w/ the competetion, but the fact, its camera quality will not beat a cybershot of SE, and their sound quality will not beat walkman phones.
thats the fact and if your not down with that! we got 2 words for you... SE!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2007-03-19 05:28
  • 2Ama
  • U
Pages: 12…2627 28 2930…3233

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.