Check Price
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
8.2
- Performance
-
8.3
- Votes:
- 39962
- Hits:
- 4479411
- Vlad
- Report
Too bad it hasn't cover for the lens.
http://www.mobiledia.com/news/42433.html
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 15:45
- mTwU
- U
- SE Supporter
- Report
how i wish SE will produce a smaller version of w900 with lens protector.. maybe umm 3mp cam haha
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 12:05
- PFMY
- U
- jinji
- Report
Does anyone know when it's coming out for sure? I can't sleep at night thinking about this phone!! :(
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 07:55
- YH4P
- U
- Jeff
- Report
i have researched many different sites on the w900 and some said that it has vibration and others said that it didn't...which one is more accurate?
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 03:20
- 4{HQ
- U
- John
- Report
Well my only concerns about buying the w900 are that i have no idea if they are for my service. Another thing is that i dont know what that camera is like whereas on the w810 i can see the back and the camera. I can't really see how the camera works on the 900.
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 03:11
- 4{HQ
- U
- Striker
- Report
John
It's not just the memory that makes the W900 the better phone (spec-wise):-
It has a much bigger screen with a higher resolution meaning crisper, brighter pictures, UTMS meaning faster data transfer and extra features such as videocalling, and it's out to buy now, whereas you'll be waiting a couple more months for the W810.
However, IMHO the W810 is a design masterpiece, probably SE's best looking phone to date, and it'll be considerably cheaper than the W900 too and the features certainly won't disappoint.....which leads back to what I said in my last post, it really boils down to personal taste and whether faster data transmission, videocalling and a bigger, crisper screen mean enough to you for you to pay the extra cash the W900 costs.
No name
Lay off TheOneDazz unless you've got anything constructive to bring to this forum. You come here, offer no advice or help to anyone, answer nobody's questions, offer no opinions, yet somehow feel you have the right to hand out an English lesson to someone who's here day in, day out and evidently has far more to bring to this forum than you. Take your close-minded attitude elsewhere. There is a logical and valid a reason why TheOneDazz writes his posts the way he does. A reason he's had to give previously in reply to wannabe English Teachers like you. But you'll not have seen that will you? cos I'm sure u don't take the time to read forums cos your too busy slating people.
- Reply
- 2006-01-14 01:52
- myX@
- U
- John
- Report
Whats so much better about the w900 just that it has more memory?
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 23:29
- 4{HQ
- U
- Jack
- Report
"Teaching an old dog some new trick" Hey that's what SE is trying to do, don't be a fool, they are all the same phone, W800,k750,or even the W550... same software or hardware just a few tweak, wanna know how I know, friend wroking as a technician at SE. I would said go for W750 with is cheaper if not W800, if you own any one this phone don't be fool to upgrade, you won't find lots of "NEW" excitment except for some new button or colour!
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 23:01
- SkE9
- U
- Striker
- Report
Ey Up Dazz!!! Hope all's well, not seen ya for a couple of days - not like u! Know whatcha mean about the W810, I'm considering it again myself now, just been offered a full satnav system cheap so I mayt not be needing the P990 after all.....ooh decisions decisions......
Jeff
I can see the point you're making, but SE are no different from any other company in that they strive to achieve a corporate identity. They succeed because their phones look like SE phones. They're instantly recognisable as SE phones, and this is the specific intention of the R&D people at SE. Same reason a Porsche looks like a Porsche and a pair of adidas trainers look like adidas trainers.
John
Technically, the W900 is the better phone. It does have a marginally better spec, but the bottom line is it solely boils down to what you will use your new phone for, and your own personal taste. The link below shows the specs side by side, that may help you decide:
http://www.gsmarena.com/compar...dPhone1=1402
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 22:50
- myX@
- U
- Jeff
- Report
Is it just me or do the w800, w810, and k750 all look like pretty much the same models?
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 22:03
- 4{HQ
- U
- TheOneDazz
- Report
@ Joakim ppl in stores neva no al day wil do is string u along, iv u luk @ da trend ov SE ow quick day release fones from wen day get anounced e.g w900 anounced oct 05 an released dec 05 (take note nokia), dis woz anounced jan 06 so shud b available 2 us in mar 06, like a said doh dun listen to dem in da shops, keep lookin online iz ma best advice
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 18:03
- MF{P
- U
- 121
- Report
like which networks support edge? t mobile, o2, vodafone...
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 18:00
- SiEd
- U
- Joakim
- Report
But when will it actually be in store? I have tried to ask retailers, but noone seems to have a clue...
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 17:51
- DI4H
- U
- TheOneDazz
- Report
yo SE peeps owz tings (striker, ken2.5 an othas). Cnt wait 4 dis 2 get released da mor a c it da mor a wan it.@ Dyon i do agree wiv ya on da colour ov da w810 but regardin da joystik mine worked fine on ma w800 so a dunno wot dis new feature wil b like howevr SE no wot day doin so it shud b easy 2 use.
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 16:27
- MF{P
- U
- Walkman
- Report
Adam, how about the offical sony ericsson site? w800 and w810 got both 176x220 resolution, but the w810 display is brighter.
- Reply
- 2006-01-13 12:43
- mhW6
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed