Sony Ericsson W950 - user opinions and reviews

Sony Ericsson

Hmm... Looks like a black calculator... Cool? Maybe? Not? Nice screen though... As the display is as big as that it could have been 16M colours. No camera... But that would totally ruined the construction anyway, because then it wouldnīt be thin. And the fact that itīs thin is the only good thing in itīs design.
Otherwise alright. Not quad-band though... But 3G.
But not really anything revolutionary... Iīd rayther have the camera of the W900 instead of a huge size and 3G..

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 19:16
  • niAw
  • U

if it had a camera like that on W800 it'd have killed the N91, but no camera is a very very bad disadvantage :(

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 19:07
  • mJD%
  • U

Looks and sounds like a good phone for me i dont use the camera on my current phone so this is suitible for me.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 18:49
  • My4V
  • U

hey dudes,finally SE releases a hot cool fone and surprisingly a symbian OS fone,very glad abt that,but alas the lack of the camera would surely not attract many customers....c'mon se,classic release,but am sure a camera wouldve made this fone no.1..
and se cameras are praised too,so y dont u produce a fully equipped fone,mainly inclduin a neat cam and of course the awaited symbian os :)

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 18:48
  • RKXV
  • U

Does this have a touch screen looks like it does? Walkman Style of the M600 cant wait for these to be realesed.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 18:45
  • My4V
  • U

excellent battery life better than n91 3-5hrs but lack of camera is a shame but what can u say cameraphones have crap lenses compared to digital cameras.....looks stunning

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 18:42
  • SeJc
  • U

i love it finally no camera prob. in work and i can listen to my music yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeees

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 18:05
  • SeFN
  • U

NO- wifi, camera, edge. rather to buy an ipod coz this is going damm costly!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 17:51
  • 5AEn
  • U

wats da point 4 having 3G but no camera. dats jus stupid , n nowadays camera is a basic thing dat a fone must have. omg SE

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 17:41
  • nyF1
  • U

great phone ..... but no camera :(

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 17:40
  • nDVS
  • U

Waiting for a Sony Ericsson phone with
1)3G,
2)Edge
3)Walkman
4)2 to 3 MP camera
5)30 fps video
6)40-80 MB Internal memory
7)Slot for additional memory upto 4 GB.
8)72+ chord sound
9)16 million colours TFT screen
10)Nice and big screen like that in 950i
11)MP3
12)Visual Radio

Sony Ericsson are you listening..!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 17:21
  • 2@tq
  • U

who needs a camera when you have 4GB of space? phone cameras will never compare to real ones. Nokia n91 has battery life of mere 3-4 hours! what is the point of having a high-end phone and carry an extra powerpack for it?
i finally found a substitution for my beloved Z600.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 16:28
  • YgFK
  • U

Finally first class phone without useless camera

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 16:12
  • StpN
  • U

nice and slim phone, but i think i don't have any problem because it has no camera, well as long as i can enjoy the music with 4GB internal memory, woohoo!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 15:43
  • PFg%
  • U

god damn guyz.. walkman is juz for marketing purpose.. No camera and wifi.. Sigh.. SE really disappoints me..

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 15:41
  • F4pr
  • U

this phone reali gd i like the the design of it, but not quite sure bout the touch screen that might make it hard to use. The camra not that big till but i think se going to upgrade it soon. But it is mostly a music devise. I love the the bluetooth headphones,listeren to music and take call, that pimpin. But does it work with the other walkman phones i realy hope so cause i'm might get the w550i or the w800i

http://www.sonyericsson.com/sp...p1&pid=10394

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 15:38
  • myVf
  • U

really nice and simple design .
but wituout camera????????shame.
sony ericsson is one of the best companies in designing and styling mobile phones.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 15:19
  • Tmgp
  • U

I just hope the lack of camera, etc. is reflected in its price, and the Nokia n91 is the ugliest phone, i've seen... EVER

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 15:00
  • myx0
  • U

I love the syle of this phone.
Nokia 91 is a disgusting looking,HUGE brick, with hdd(one drop...one kill). I can get myself this phone AND a camera, and still occupy less space than the nokia. I don't give a f*ck about it's wifi and camera. In music quality terms, it loses.

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 14:53
  • nDyj
  • U

no camera = big mistake !!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-02-14 14:52
  • mWCg
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.