so no 16 gigs of memory, but the same specs... what makes this phone shines????
cuz I was thinking that nexus S is really good and is 100% geting upgrades?
HEY GUYS !)I wached and read a lot of information about SE arc,and nobody even officials do not call it FLAGSHIP
KreanInW9595, 07 Jan 2011Of cause, Super AMOLED Plus is a better version of Super AMOLED. But it's a result of developm... moreTo KreanInW9595
Beware please, these blind fans would say that any negative comment is wrong, as you can see SE is struggling to make good phones, falling behind others,
SE announced only this phone yet, and with poor specs again, thats why they do this, tell all the lies.
They will say that SE phones single core processors are faster than other dual cores,
Does this phone have sony's clear stereo clear bass etc ?
Anonymous, 07 Jan 2011it already performed very nicely. There is a photo of benchmark for Arc. And you can see that ... moreArc's benchmark score is even better than nexus s which comes with vanilla android.
The vanilla version phone should perform much better but this time a customised android phone performs much better & that's se.
abhi, 07 Jan 2011Did u see sony ericsson x10 mini / mini pro's benchmark results ???
It performed much better ... moreThe reason the mini and mini pro performed so well in the benchmark tests was bcos of the low resolution. The droid had the same speed CPU but a higher resolution which is why it did worse. Also they were running different versions of android. As a result the mini was dealing with 65k colors and the droid was with 16mil. Look up benchmarks of motorola flipout vs nexus 1 on YouTube. In the first test flipout has more fps. In the second test u can see that the flipout beat the recorded score of the x10. The flipout has the same resolution as x10 mini and same speed CPU so that shud be a closer competition.
I'm not saying this to defend motorola. I'm just pointing out a few reasons why the x10 mini scored so good on those tests.
!!!!attention!!!!i want to ask gsm arena---how is this possible,that se arc has on your site just 26% daily interest with total hits more than 188000,and samsung infuse has 46% daily interest with total hits just 44000
!!!!!if you are cheating,at least cheat wise))))))))))))
The processor is MSM8255, not QSD8250! Please correct it!
abhi, 07 Jan 2011Did u see sony ericsson x10 mini / mini pro's benchmark results ??? It performed much better ... moreit already performed very nicely. There is a photo of benchmark for Arc. And you can see that it trashed all other phones listed, including samsung galaxy s
KreanInW9595, 07 Jan 2011Of cause, Super AMOLED Plus is a better version of Super AMOLED. But it's a result of developm... moreI don't know if u like se or not but don't post negative comments about this phone which r not true.
Only an se hater would do that.
Go to ur favourite company's site, post ur opinions there & be happy with what they r offering u .
We like what se provides.
abhi, 07 Jan 2011I never said that single core is better than dual core . I just said that motorola's implement... moreThe problem is no one ever see Moto with Tegra in actions. As much as we can talk is about its hardware.
Talking about aged phone is useless. If not, Nokia must be the only best phone today.
ı very like sony ericsson.k790i-w910i-c702i-vivaz-zylo after ı take xperia arc.ı am happy:))
Guyz.....does any of u could tell how much this phone is in dollars. Thanks....:)
abhi, 07 Jan 2011What did super amoled prove ??? That it has the most immature colour rendering seen so far .
... moreOf cause, Super AMOLED Plus is a better version of Super AMOLED. But it's a result of development prosess, not as an alternative.
And this doesn't change the fact that Samsung just announced a better version of it. LG also announced NOVA Dispay which out perform Super AMOLED too.
I didn't say BRAVIA is bad. But it didn't have a prove to be great as yet. That's all I want to say.
KreanInW9595, 07 Jan 2011Yeah, I also think he's wrong. It's like saying a Pentium 4 can do better than Core i7. Just s... moreI never said that single core is better than dual core . I just said that motorola's implementation of processors is very bad which will make it's dual core perform very badly when compared with dual core of others.
Anonymous, 07 Jan 2011To KreanInW9595
No abhi wrong, Motorola Droid at 550Mhz performed better than X10 at 1GHz a... moreDid u see sony ericsson x10 mini / mini pro's benchmark results ???
It performed much better than motorola droid & even comparable to samsung galaxy s.
The thing which ruined the benchmark scores for x10 was it's extremely heavy mediascape & timescape customizations .
But se has ditched mediascape out of xperia arc & has made timescape much more lighter which means that it will perform very nicely.
Anonymous, 07 Jan 2011To KreanInW9595
No abhi wrong, Motorola Droid at 550Mhz performed better than X10 at 1GHz a... moreYeah, I also think he's wrong. It's like saying a Pentium 4 can do better than Core i7. Just some ridicurous words.
Not just Moto which uses Tegra in 2011, but Samsung and LG as well. We will see SE Arc's future soon. I hope it will not as bad as peverious XPERIA.
KreanInW9595, 07 Jan 2011I said the TEST, not just some random hands-on or preview when an actually retail unit doesn't... moreWhat did super amoled prove ??? That it has the most immature colour rendering seen so far .
And if this screen was so good than why samsung came out with a better alternate (super amoled plus) saying that it has much more correct & natural colour rendering.
Super amoled was just a gimmick played by samsung with highly over saturated colours which looked good to see but were the most false colours .