Sony Ericsson Xperia ray - user opinions and reviews

Sony Ericsson

Popularity

Daily interest
1.9%
Total hits:
8983187

Voting results

Design
7.7
Features
7.4
Performance
7.3
Votes:
189

Sort by:

first i think i made it clear why the ray is almost 200$ more than the mini :)
and for the galaxy s2 volume ya u r absolutely right, and here comes the designers role ;)

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-27 10:58
  • fvJn
  • R

> In reply to LooL @ 2011-07-27 09:54 from wdDn - click to readExactly, and you can put a 4.3 inch screen into a xperia mini's size phone.

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-27 10:28
  • PBRB
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-07-26 14:13 from fvJn - click to readThe gigantic Samsung S II is 123,5x66,1x8,5=69,38 cm3, same volume as Xperia mini 69,05 cm3. But it is hard to say they are the same size...And i like phone a bit thick, they are easier to hold.

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-27 09:54
  • wdDn
  • R

> In reply to LooL @ 2011-07-26 20:44 from wdB8 - click to readHmm....its all up to the individual i gues...I find the mini(especially the white one) very ugly...I find Ray much more subtle n beautiful...At the end of the day its upto the individual...People have different tastes

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-27 08:20
  • ut}@
  • R

> In reply to [deleted post]i have'nt heard of a death grip issue w/ SE phones b4.

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-27 04:48
  • wYFu
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-07-26 14:13 from fvJn - click to readTechnically you are right but the new mini is so cute (and i am a guy), when the Ray looks nothing special

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 20:44
  • wdB8
  • R

if u calculated the volume of the xperia ray u will find:
111 x 53 x 9.4 = 55,300 mm cube
and if u calculated the volume of the xperia mini u will find:
83 x 52 x 16 = 69,056 mm cube
conclusion xperia ray is smaller than the mini with a larger high resolution screen n better camera n longer life battery :)

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 14:13
  • fvJn
  • C

> In reply to pressefr @ 2011-07-25 17:41 from qW2g - click to readI wouldn't say "upset", but I agree with you on the bit that it's better than the arc

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 13:55
  • 3SMI
  • R

nice spec...also design.....but what about the price? in dollars.

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 12:06
  • tUcQ
  • C

> In reply to LooL @ 2011-07-26 10:09 from Mfxf - click to readRay over Mini
8 mp cam over 5mp
2mp front facing cam(but no video call)over no front face cam
1500mah battery over 1200mah
3.3inch over 3inch
480*854 over 320*480
Very slim design
document editor
some xmor r technology
These are all the differences i found...Apparently you are right..I dont see why its priced too high with no real advantages over mini considering the price gap...

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 11:00
  • utx0
  • R

My bad, different camera
Mini= 5Mp
Ray= 8Mp
But still believe Ray is too expensive

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 10:09
  • Mfxf
  • U

Exactly same specs as the new mini, except for screen 3,3" instead of 3"
From UK web site:
Price of mini: 210 pounds = 340 dollars
Price Xray: 350 pounds = 570 dollars

Why such a difference ??

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 10:06
  • Mfxf
  • U

Exactly same specs as the new Mini, except for screen 3,3" instead of 3"
From UK web site Play.com:
Price of Mini: 210 pounds 340 dollars
Price Xray: 350 pounds = 570 dollars

Why such a difference ??

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 10:05
  • Mfxf
  • U

> In reply to mecoollalu @ 2011-07-26 09:51 from s8cR - click to readUnfrotunately only 300mb is available for installing apps/games which is very less given the fact that there are phones around this price range which give high internal storage

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 10:03
  • utx0
  • R

> In reply to Rachana @ 2011-07-26 06:19 from 693j - click to readEverybody have their strong points and weak points...SE cant make screens like Samsung and samsung cant make phones that dont look lyk apple....lol...But practically speaking the screen of SE droids is good enough in both indoors n sunlight...Dont get too geeky about screen technology...Even o nthe geeky front SE Ray is not bad at all it has the same pixel density as that of iphone...

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 10:01
  • utx0
  • R

> In reply to Anonymous @ 2011-07-21 12:32 from t7KC - click to readit has 1gb internal memmory yaar...
so it can hold upcoming versions of android
so dont worry............!!!!!!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 09:51
  • s8cR
  • R

Screen display can't match with super AMOLED or retina display. Why sony can't improve it?

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-26 06:19
  • 693j
  • U

> In reply to pressefr @ 2011-07-25 17:41 from qW2g - click to readyou're 50% correct! It's fatter then arc also is thinner than the big bro. Ray's thickness stands between arc and arc.

Xperia ray: 9.4 mm
Xperia arc: 8.7 mm (the slimest part)
Xperia arc: 10 mm (thickest part)

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-25 18:48
  • txjn
  • R

nice but super expensive

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-25 17:48
  • t7$d
  • U

Is it just me, but is no one upset how its fatter than the Arc?

  • Reply
  • 2011-07-25 17:41
  • qW2g
  • C
Sort by:
Total of 5761 user reviews and opinions for Sony Ericsson Xperia ray.