Sony Ericsson XPERIA X1 - user opinions and reviews
Voting results
- Design
-
8.4
- Features
-
8.5
- Performance
-
8.4
- Votes:
- 18485
- Hits:
- 1334605
@ TSEPZ;
F*O*O*L of you to enter this XPERIA X1 forum...and your NOKIA phones sell fake phones not like SE they do not sell fake phones and furthermore if your NOKIA is powerful why can't even ONE of your NOKIA phones even your King and Queen N95 and N82 and your children E90 too doesn't have 500+ MHZ processor and 2nd NOKIA phones doesn't have TOUCHSCREEN too and NO! VGA too...tsk tsk tsk!!!
- 2008-05-13 15:33 04}j
hey tsepz,
i m fully agree with you.nokia is king se is just*****.i read the preview of w980 and found that its not a match for n81/95/96.
n81 is better than w980 in ANY/EVERY area.so..........
all hail to king nokia.
i openly accept my defeat.lol lol lol
- Dani
- 2008-05-13 15:32 vGxL
who in the hell says that i m not real?you se fanboys cant accept the fact that nokia is the no 1.se is just a tiny waterdroplet in the nokia ocean.just accept this fact and shutup for ever.
yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
- Tsepz
- 2008-05-13 15:23 vGxL
you all talk about this phone, but does anybody have it. NO, of course. you are all loosers and stop posting on something you don't own.
- koko
- 2008-05-13 15:19 SHSe
that's not REAL tsepz (i'm not fooled this time)
tspez is much smarter than that stupid provocating brainless guy...
by the way, I'm really surprised to see 3,2 MP picture so smooth. Better than 5 MP in QVGA, and tons of features!!
it makes me want to buy it even more badly!!
finish it!! Make the performance faster and release it already!!
- eternal_wind
- 2008-05-13 14:52 wrdH
TSEPZ, for your enlightenment NOKIA is by far the most premitive, pre historic design and features compare to any brand of cell phone, and please advice your nokia to even hire engineers fron china so that for sure nokia will be someday will be a true phone and we all can say at last nokia is now a phone......
- weng
- 2008-05-13 14:14 RGqF
Nokia fanboy say thet the N82 is better than X1, is it true? look at the fact below :
1. WVGA (X1) is 5 times better than QVGA.
2. 528 MHz (X1) is faster than 300+ MHz.
3. X1 has QWERTY, Touch screen and joystick and Nokia phone like N95/N82/N96 has not QWERTY, no touch screen etc, only E90 has QWERTY but no touch screen.
4. X1 has longer life battery at 1500 Li-PO
5. X1 has 4 LED light
6. X1 use 6.1 WM OS.
7. X1 is made of premium steel but almost Nokia phone is made of plastick.
8. X1 has HSUPA
9. X1 has VGA resolution of video on WVGA resolution screen, It means WVGA will increase resolution of VGA video as much as 76800pxl. In other word, You can watch a movie better than the device quality it self and look at Nokia phone, VGA resolution of video on QVGA resolution screen, it means QVGA will decrease VGA resolution of video (307200 to 76800).In other word, Nokia fanboy never enjoy VGA resolution of video at real quality on the ohone screen.Wasting money
10. X1 can show more pixels of Megapixels camera picture because resolution of screen which can show pixels as much as 384000 pxl rather than N82 can only show 76800pxl on screen so althought you use 5MP camera,only 76800pxl can be showed because limitation of QVGA screen resolution.In other word 3.2 MP on phone WVGA resolution screen is much better than 5MP on phone QVGA resolution screen.
11. 65000 color is more than enough and not make the phone more expensive. Look at expensive 16M color, do you thing there is an object has 16M color variation? is you car ? You painted your car with red, blue, black, yellow, green, pink, brown, purple and what else because there are stil 8 color not 16MILLION color variation.You can't detect color as mush as 16M color variation at once sight and your eyes have limitation.
Wasting money for buying a phone with useless devices
- 2008-05-13 13:49 vppV
@VgX6
Hey stop to be provocator here by using people's nickname for cheating people. You are very impolite and uneducated, maybe your parents never teach you well or maybe your parents are an insane people so the son like them too. I want to inform you nokia fanboys that X1 has higher device than nokia has right now and it's the fact, please you check full official X1 spec and all of nokia phone then compare them by your self in neutral position, you must accept the fact and we also accept the fact if there is nokia phone which has higher devices than X1 later so what are you fighting for? It's a shame if you still push your self for comparing your nokia phone with X1 which has higher devices than Nokia phone. Be a patient guy because maybe next year nokia will make a phone has high devices quality.OK!
- indra
- 2008-05-13 13:21 vppV
yes tsepz i m agree with u .
i threw my w850 and got n81 .you r right it is better than w850 in any/every area.
I ACCEPT MY DEFEAT
- Dani
- 2008-05-13 12:05 vGx6
my nokia n81 is better than your se w850 in any/every area.
yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
- TSEPZ
- 2008-05-13 12:03 vGx6
se sucks bigggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg times.cant match nokia.got my point DANI
- TSEPZ
- 2008-05-13 12:01 vGx6
Nokia cant even make a battery used in it working 4 more than a yr or 2, each screw in a nokia phone is an agreement with another company, this makes it less in quality...
- 2008-05-13 09:55 jLBr
I work for 3, fulltime. have spent hours with our Sony Ericsson rep talking about this handset, it is fantastic. the only thing that he has suggested it lacks is a decent video processor.
i was not aware that the TyTN-3 was coming, having said that, 3 was dumb enough to ditch the TyTN-2.
im a SE fan, and i also use a N95. in regards to another note i saw on here, yeah i spose you could say that about nokia, they do have alot of problems in comparison the the Sony's. really looking forward to the xperia. rumour has it we should get it in stores around november this year ;)
i can promise ill be one to pay off my n95 and my K850i and upgrade straight away...
- Kennedy
- 2008-05-13 09:46 PQ%d
Nokia probably is the worst phone i ever seen, Nokia know only one thing copying things from other company, like a looser, i have seen nokia they cant make thr own lenses like SE does they just have contract with carl zeis coz they cant compete so i guess nokia sucks alot , and i have seen ths alot of time nokia alwasy crashes alot ,
- vishnuraj
- 2008-05-13 09:32 PB7U
In fact SE is much closer in technology level to Alcatel then to Nokia ! Only a fool will argue otherwise. And finaly do not confuse SE with HTC. There is not only one more letter in the word but,if you look closely,you will see that the letters are different :-) HTC builds the X1 and not SE ! Have you ever asked yourself WHY NOT? Samsung and LG payed the high fees to Nokia to licence the S60 OS. SE and Motorola did not. Look at the market share and profit level increase/decrease and you will see,incidentally SE and Moto are going down :-)
STOP supporting a looser - otherwise you may turn into one too ! ! !
- Goldenberg
- 2008-05-13 08:13 N9sr
Wrong dudes NOKIA doesn't have "TOUCHSCREEN" even their King and Queen N95 and N82 and NOKIA doesn't also have VGA too and NOKIA DOESN'T have the processor of "500+ MHZ processor" NOKIA has have 300+ MHZ processor which is poor in browsing files and through internet period
- NOKIA loosers
- 2008-05-13 07:19 04}s
Have any of you owned an E90?I had the E90 but could not stand it for more than a week before I sold it for a huge loss.
No matter what you have heard of Nokia the build quality was pathetic. The casing creeked giving the impression of cheap quality. The key tops had started scratching the inner screen and the unit would wobble if you made an attempt to use it like a laptop. The keyboard may look very impressive but was a horrible experience to use. I am using Touchpal right now and find it much better than the Nokia hardware keyboard.
Lack of good software was another reason for me not keeping the Nokia. Was not able to find a decent spreadsheet which would even come close to SoftMakers PlanMaker
- 2008-05-13 06:15 0T2d
Market share doesn't explain the technology...
e.g: try to compare Honda and Ferarri. Honda has much bigger market share, but Ferrari has much advanced technology.
And so do Sony Ericsson and Nokia
- eternal_wind
- 2008-05-13 05:23 wrd4
are you people serious? i like your opinions, lets deal with facts:
1- nokia had, has and will always have a greater market share than SE
2- once you get past your own bias, you will realize that nokia phones are more advanced in features class for class
3- THERE IS NO PHONE NOKIA HAS RIGHT NOW THAT CAN COMPARE TO THE XPERIA. Good, SE got to a full touchscreen smartfone first, give them props, but wait until nokia eventually brings out its touch device next year.
please stop trying to make SE seem like a equal to nokia, its not, nokia has far more years of market experience than SE. yes SE has wonderful devices, this phone is wonderful, but in reality, there is no device SE has that can even start to compare to the ability of the N95 8 gig. this cant, the P1 cant, neither can the G900.
- 2008-05-13 05:16 kbhP
Well nick and philm, if se is utter rubbish then there word word to describe nokia which even worst than se. I think u never saw a se phone in ur life and thats why ur supporting nokia
- Ag
- 2008-05-13 04:02 jLBr
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed