I posted the justamp.blogspot site, but it is not published yet, sorry. Write on Google bro, and you will find it.
phoenix, 07 Nov 2009which site do you mean at first one?I mean the justamp.blogspot(dot)com site, after that the concept phones. On the Justamp... site you can find about Kurara. The concept... site, it is about concept phones. I would like to send you the justamp... site, but probably I can't.
ACID, 07 Nov 200965k colors only? i can understand y the 1st two xperias hv 65k colors - cos they use winmo an... moreOk then. It's your task to compare the both screen, soon when they release, and tell us which screen is the best from human eye's view. Not just theory on paper.
Anonymous , 07 Nov 2009this phone is realy cheap
se is realy great Hustler
realy funny :
65k color in 2009... moreand you forgot something:...and still everyone love it!
ask yourself: why?!
i tell you why: bcz even with these specs, it`s still the king.
every se phone with a price tag of $400 or above must have a xenon flash and nice big capacitive touch screen with multi touch then only se will be able to compete with samsung and lg.
this phone is realy cheap
se is realy great Hustler
realy funny :
65k color in 2009
and no Multi-touch input method !!!! ????
just 1gb internal and just up to 16GB sd !??!
GPRS Class 10 , EDGE Class 10 , HSUPA, 2 Mbps
just one useless LED flash
Android OS 1.6 ??!!!
and the body from cheap plastic and not metal
even in this class hd2 is beter
x10+ x2+ x1 + capacitive 16M +Multi touch = milestone
65k colors only?
i can understand y the 1st two xperias hv 65k colors - cos they use winmo and the 1st one was built by htc. but y did se not put a 16mil colors display like they have on satio? r they trying to make satio stand out above x10? sure some will say look at sony ericsson x1. yes that was a nice display but mainly bcos of its resolution. on this phone they didnt increase the resolution by much but increased the screen size by an inch. in fact the reason y se x1 had such a nice display was bcos of its very high dpi or ppi. if u compare the dpi/ppi of x1 against dpi/ppi of this, x1 has more!
compare this to moto milestone (probably its main rival) and moto milestone has 16mil screen. yes its a smaller screen at 3.7" but it has a better dpi/ppi too meaning its screen will be more vibrant/crisp than x10s.
im sorry but i was expecting more from SE cos i believe they r capable of more.
dog 1, 07 Nov 2009is this suppose 2 be sony ericsons version of the i phone?Yes it is. X10 is an iphone killer. Now we're lookin' for X10 killer.
can any1 plz tel me whats the diffrence between this phone and sonyericsson satio i find them very much similar?
seems like sony has stopped thinking to cater the satisfied users. all complicated gadgests are coming but no news about any changes or upgrades in p1i... sony/gsmarena can u answer ????
seems like all this play gadgests are coming in the near future nothing to suit in a businessman or give in a personality look or a kind of snob appeal of possessing the sony unlike p1i
Anonymous, 07 Nov 2009damn god go to hell!! 65K display dude.......WTF is the matter wit u?........y r u so bloody stuck with the 65K display....u shudn't complain coz as far as i c it.....nokia provides 16M display to most of their mid-level and high-end phones coz thats the only thing they can brag about....... dude and the pity is...nokia with all the 16M colors can't beat even a single mobile from HTC and SE in terms of display clarity and brilliance..... for all i know.....the only difference i ever could tell between the n97 and the x1 display is that x1 is seriously beautiful in this department....... keep ur nokia displays to urself and not in this forum.. nokia is nothin but white paper trash and pointless bigger harddrive capacity......... they dont do shit bout the performance......