Anonymous, 13 Feb 2015this phone doesnt look like samsung it looks like asus phone hahaha...No it does Not.... It's a Sony quality built machine! Hehe
someone practical, 12 Feb 2015For 100 pounds I won't complain. Good buy.Atleast someone is wise out there
hi this phone is not desighned from sony i think
its look like a samsung phone model
sony desighn is really awesome but this phone does not reach the expectations
sony has its own style the all xperia phones are awesome
i think this is not from xperia family
i prefer e3 than buying this it has a qualcom snapdragon and adreno 305 this thing is waste the difference is having a 2mp secondary camera
Damn ! This is the ugliest sony xperia I have ever seen ! It looks very very cheap, it has a mediatek chipset wich is for low-end phones, not so good ! I preffer the Xperia M instead o this one ! Just because this phone looks like a potato !
This phone would have been amazing. If it was released with 280+ppi and Mali mp4.
Sony e1 beats Mali mp2 .LOL
Anonymous, 11 Feb 2015All brands worst.. Sony da best no Sir samsung and lg the best,and this stuff looks like an iphone 6 v2.0
vikkygame, 12 Feb 2015Definitely it will last longer if it will be cheap.. IF CHEAP..lol my galaxy xcover is an old model from 2011 and i bought it from 2013 more expensive than today's xperia e3
Until launch of Xperia E3, I was also a Sony fan...but disappointed with camera quality provided by Xperia E3
Friends, just few differences between E3 & E4, rest all similar...be careful...
Sony not using its own Xmor/IMX sensors in both these handsets which leads to poor camera result compare to rivals who are using Sony's Xmor/IMX sensors and offering at lessor price...(eg. Xolo Q1010i, etc.)
RPG96, 12 Feb 2015I agree this phone will last longer than any other cheap smartphones.Definitely it will last longer if it will be cheap.. IF CHEAP..