Sony Xperia GX SO-04D - user opinions and reviews

Sony

Check Price

Popularity

Daily interest
  N/A
Total hits:
723919

Voting results

Design
6.4
Features
6.4
Performance
6.4
Votes:
116


Sort by:

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-27 10:27 from YQN4 - click to readHay this is not false information. I will always quality products that not priced very high. First I also not believe this plastic cost around 400 $ but it is true.
You just compare with samsung mobile. Plastic of samsung is very worst and not only mobile I saw samsung refrigerator and compared with panasonic and shocked. Very worst plastic.

Another thing sony like brand is always used by only some peoples who prefer best quality with average price like volkswagan, skoda and some one prefer Iphone who like to buy audi, bmw. Some one like you always choose maruthi ie samsung,nokia who prefers low price low quality

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-28 04:29
  • 7qD$
  • R

> In reply to sony @ 2012-05-27 16:43 from dMM0 - click to readAnd I believe an alien from mars must have given you the details of plastic used by sony along with its price...rofl...where on earth does the plastic cost 400$ per kg...and for God's sake stop comparing Sony smartphone to Volkswagen automobiles...God won't forgive you for insulting Volkswagen if you ever again compare Sony smartphone to Volkswagen...lol

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 21:18
  • rJRN
  • R

> In reply to rco @ 2012-05-27 16:34 from dMM0 - click to readyou must be kidding, don't you...wait a minute, why don't you explain the criteria on which we might decide who is the best (I expect you to give me the most humorous criteria for deciding success and failure of a smartphone company)...go back to school and learn the basics for deciding success and failure of the company...may be you will learn there that turnover is the most major decisive factor for reputation and success.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 21:03
  • rJRN
  • R

this is a great technology....am looking forwrd to this...sony is up .hope to see some tabs soon

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 18:44
  • Ns9B
  • U

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-27 10:27 from YQN4 - click to readsony is quality...samsung uses plastic 1kg=50$ sony uses plastic 1kg=400$ for me sony is as like volkswagen...quality and not very expensive...sony products has real price as like volkswagen automobiles

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 16:43
  • dMM0
  • R

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-27 10:27 from YQN4 - click to readfinancial results don't matter...best seller things dont mean that they are the best things...sony is the best...

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 16:34
  • dMM0
  • R

> In reply to vijay vijay @ 2012-05-27 05:13 from utp@ - click to readETH samsusng is way more expensive than sony here.. samsung is overated trying to level with apple.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 11:16
  • 7X9@
  • R

Sony really should wait about a revolution in the technology field
Sony Xperia GX SO-04D is truly unique
Well done to your perseverance
I love Sony

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 10:35
  • nsA2
  • C

Prove your points guys...how can you say Sony produces best handset...mere randomly mentioning the wrong rate of plastic won't justify your comment, nowhere on earth plastic costs 400$/kg(I can't even imagine from where did you collected that data)...or just because of a stylish design, you can't deny the fact that Sony are nothing but loosers...just check the financial results of Sony in terms of sales and then hold the financial results of Samsung in front of your eyes...you will again admit that Sony are nothing but loosers...and those out here who are trying to teach me the lesson of technology behind dual cores and quad cores, go and get your own concepts cleared and then argue with me...Samsung delivers what customers want and within a limited timeframe...they dethroned Nokia from top position, who dominated for about 10 years in smartphone arena...Samsung has got wildest range of handsets as far as specs and budget are concerned...so stop arguing about the fact that Sony are good for nothing except announcing a middle level technology handset and then ensuring that their fans have to wait for almost an eternity to grab an outdated technology handset(outdated at the time of release)

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 10:27
  • YQN4
  • U

looks like the first sony that's gonna shine in front of my eyes :-)

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 10:16
  • HF25
  • U

i am a bigggggggggg hard core fan of sony bt i think the sony should work with its battery performance and its ram thn they could rock in the market

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 10:13
  • n2K6
  • U

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-27 00:03 from U{19 - click to readyou are wrong. Sony is the best the smart phone in the world . because it has the best pic quality and video quality and good looking phone . other phone sucks .and also good processing speed . other phone may look much brighter in AMMO LED or O LED . But when it comes to out quality Sony is much better and they are specialized in camera , music and screen quality (bravia engine ) . Bravia engine gives the true color and best quality of video playback and video recording. the comparison through gsmarena.com is useless .if you have to compare any phone then please visit a mobile show room and check the original demo phone which is not available in normal retailer shop, and see the difference . Sony is much better than any other phone. For example Samsung galaxy s3 is the latest android phone which has advanced technology but Sony Xperia S is much better than S3 in almost everything .it even beats APPLE iphone 4s .

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 07:41
  • U{jx
  • R

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-26 23:51 from U{19 - click to readSony mobile price is always little high when compared to samsung, nokia but if you compare to iphone its price is very low.

Samsung uses plastic 1kg- 50$
Sony uses plastic 1kg - 400$

This is real information. From this we can easily understood for plastic itself samsung using low quality and for every thing samsung using low quality. Sony is japan company they don't reduce quality of phone by low quality materials.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 05:13
  • utp@
  • R

> In reply to AndroidFreak @ 2012-05-26 19:57 from ut0t - click to readYes you are right. I think those that are looking for quad core etc are just someone that don't know that much on phones and technology. They just want to put everything in and don't know what's going on. With Sony, I think they are really thinking and giving what the world needs for now. Good job and I am patiently waiting for Xperia GX to hit global market.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 03:04
  • rMq8
  • R

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-25 20:30 from rJR1 - click to readI always feel Sony's phone has the best design. HW is one thing but it is not all about a phone. Hence I think Sony's phone is not really overrated. The one that is really overrated is Samsung. Then again it depends on individuals and what is your preference. HW, Design or Software?

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 02:59
  • rMq8
  • R

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-25 20:30 from rJR1 - click to readSony are not over-rated they are actually the best in the mobile world.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 02:09
  • Nvas
  • R

> In reply to AndroidFreak @ 2012-05-26 19:57 from ut0t - click to readAnd lets just keep specification aside, you might be well aware of the performance of Sony when it comes to launching a handset in the market...one may have to wait for atleast 3 to 4 months to grab this handset...and you never know when Sony would change its mind as far as global release of this handset is concerned...and talking about class, Sony is suffering from heavy losses in smartphone department...they are surviving because of their quality products in other departments...but when it comes to smartphones, they are simply loosers

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-27 00:03
  • U{19
  • R

> In reply to AndroidFreak @ 2012-05-26 19:57 from ut0t - click to readCompare this handset with gs3 and you will feel the difference...dual core here as çompared to quad core...timescape ui as çompared to touchwiz 4.0(I hope you know that touchwiz 4.0 is far better than timescape)...no USB on the go support...no video codecs such as xvid, divx...Bluetooth 3.0 as compared to 4.0...although it has a better camera but only just when it comes to still images capturing...still snapdragon chipset as compared to exynos quad...gpu, adreno 225 as compared to Mali 400-mp...I think I have given enough justification to my feedback as to why Sony handsets are always overrated whereas actually they are not that much deserving...average raiting of gx is around 9.47 and average rating of gs3 is 8.23

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-26 23:51
  • U{19
  • R

This is the Perfect phone am looking for. Please launch it here in Ph :)

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-26 22:19
  • vxrD
  • U

> In reply to anshul.blackpearl @ 2012-05-25 20:30 from rJR1 - click to readexcuse me anshul but i oppose your feedback that they are over rated. B'Coz if you think practically a person who can expend that much will not get better than that, i mean, just look at the New Timescape UI it is far better than Sense UI and more...the processor is very fast and dual core 1.5 is more than enough, so why go for the quad core ones...SONY is a class apart.

  • Reply
  • 2012-05-26 19:57
  • ut0t
  • R
Sort by:
Total of 198 user reviews and opinions for Sony Xperia GX SO-04D.