Sony Xperia T review: T-rex
Apple iPad mini review: One for the roadSony Xperia T - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.2
- Features
-
7.2
- Performance
-
7.2
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-26 17:53 from vaNH - click to readi add to my last post, to be fair.. The low white temp on my HTC causes the display to turn a bit yellowish in white colors, even a bit brown yellowish. I will not try to deny that Sony Ericzn had one or two models with a yellow tint as well, which may (or may not, i explain under why "may not") came from poor calibration of the white, but it wasnt nearly as bad as the Desire Z, just a tiny tad low on the SE.
NOW, low white temp is always favorable over high temp for readability outdoors. On nokia N9 there is even a reduction in white temp when display is at max brightness (Auto max, this superbright setting is not available for manual setting on N9). White temp isnt the only thing nokia manipulates on the max brightness on the N9 but its one of the things, and they said they do this to increase sunlight readability. I had an N9 and it surely did something to its display that helped in sunlight, it was not bad at all. SGS3 has a high white temperature, and any SGS3 owner can tell you that its not good in sunlight, so obviously low temp helps, and thats possibly the reason why SonyEriczn experimented with slightly reduced white temp on some models. I believe they sacrificed some color accuracy to increase sunlight readability, and hope they will not do that again, if they do such a thing then they should do it only on max brightness, as Nokia did.
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 18:08
- vaNH
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-26 13:23 from vMew - click to readMy Xperia Pro also have that same viewing angle, not great no, not like my HTC Desire Z with its Super-LCD and great viewing angle and so on. The HTC has a great display, really, but isnt even close to being half the cellphone that the Xperia Pro is, HTC Sense has always been a source of crash and so on. I tried many phones but at the end of the day SonyEriczn was the ones that worked and was reliable, never hang or crash.
Plus, the HTC SLCD display has a very low color white temperature, and other colors are a bit off as well, so for accurate viewing of high quality photos i much rather have a Sony than a HTC or Samsung or whatever, i even take the Sony over LGs IPS displays. Optimus X2 was not even close in competing with the Xperia Pro in color accuracy, only Apple can do it as good as Sony, HTC SAMSUNG LG dont care about color calibration, not even Motorola does (or else they would not be so addicted to AMOLED on their high end units).
For accurate colors, SONY and Apple, and Nokia on a doubtful 3rd place. Doubt because Nokia had many terrible displays where the colors were totally off, like the 5800 which had a very unfavorable color accuracy that made even the mega-mal-calibrated galaxy S look ok (Galaxy S has a white temperature of more than 10,000 kelvin, thats why its so super blue where it should be white)
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 17:53
- vaNH
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
There is a bit change in resolution than xperia s, but it is better than samsung in quality, but you know they need to mark it and support it by other products and accessories
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 17:19
- mc}s
- U
- Sonythetop
- Report
- 0
> In reply to karen @ 2012-09-25 06:47 from vfxa - click to readagreed with Sony is late to enter the market
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 14:10
- uAi7
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-25 21:02 from mG@@ - click to readwill quote from the review.. 'You really need to be looking at the Xperia T head-on to experience arguably the best image quality from an LCD, as once you tilt the phone even a tiny bit, the image quality deteriorates noticeably.'...
once you tilt the phone EVEN A TINY BIT the display looses alot of image quality.. pretty much was the reason i sold my xperia S... again this seems to be an ongoing problem with sony and their lcd screens
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 13:23
- vMew
- U
- sam
- Report
- 0
> In reply to karen @ 2012-09-25 06:47 from vfxa - click to readYes,I am fan of SONY products. I am trying to buy some other phones, that's not possible for me.I like two main things in Sony mobiles one is soud and camara.I was looking for xperia Ion but not available in the market. i was using vivaz pro,i waited soo long and i purchased ARC S(of course now Ion is available in market). till now no products of sony are not available in market on time.some times i feel sony r lazy.
I told u again i great fan of Sony. I never,ever buy any other brand. because i love Sony. But what to do
- Reply
- 2012-09-26 13:11
- ut1D
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2012-09-25 13:30 from vMew - click to readTell me, what is so important about viewangle?
Second, i think people think that viewangles are so important (without any argument) are STUPID!!!!!!
Third, you and those other people are AMoled freaks and come here to bash.
Four, go back to your Crapsung forum and stay there.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 21:02
- mG@@
- R
- vX-2
- Report
- 0
Where to get it in usa? Would at&t carry it? or even Verizon? I would buy this phone over others w/o a heartbeat.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 20:26
- xnUB
- Q
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to EskeRahn @ 2012-09-25 01:01 from 0u3G - click to readLol there is no way a screen with poor viewing angles could be considered a good thing,... point is most other screens from other manufacturers don't have this issue.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 13:30
- vMew
- R
- TechBro
- Report
- 0
Nice Phone Sony!!!
Wait... what! 550 euros ,WTH are you out of your mind, id rather have GS3 for less.
Come on sony, u can do better than this.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 11:52
- uWE2
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Think smart @ 2012-09-24 05:13 from KiNX - click to readDon't mean to bash, I did warn you... the review has turned out basically spot on to my predictions... again there is not a dual core krait or not that out performs a quad, again warned u about sony and their screens poor viewing angles... but wasn't expecting such an average camera performance
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 10:46
- vMew
- R
- Virkill
- Report
- 0
@karen, i will not comment anything like that if not because of those samsung fan boys making flames and trolling here, they are the one who started this after all. I'm not a die hard fan of sony, im just tellin the truth. They still have an edge in terms of technology.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 09:21
- v0qF
- U
- karen
- Report
- 0
> In reply to [deleted post]Virkil I think you're the one that delusional, too obsessed with Japanese tech, or Sony at particular.
Your comments sounds like you're saying million peoples that buying SGS 3 are stupid ? so they buy Samsung phone because they think Sony didn't exist ?
I believe people that buying SGS 3 are smart tho, they know what they are buying. Same with Sony user too.
So don't be delusional, you're clearly too obsessed with Sony phone.
I like both Sony and Samsung. I won't lie, they are both good companies to me. They have produced many good phones.
The problem with Sony phones are just they sometimes a little too late to enter the market. Perhaps because they have strict QC or long testing phase or something, I don't know. They have their own standard for sure, and they're consistent with it.
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 06:47
- vfxa
- R
- nai97™
- Report
- 0
> In reply to EskeRahn @ 2012-09-25 01:01 from 0u3G - click to readyup i totally agree
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 04:28
- RxVc
- R
- EskeRahn
- Report
- 0
When you post
"Display has sub-par viewing angles for a flagship"
Try to consider that for most people a phone is a one person device, where 'poor' viewing angle can even be seen as beneficial for privacy reasons when used in public, say a bus or a train...
Sunlight legibility is the key-factor for the displays usability...
- Reply
- 2012-09-25 01:01
- 0u3G
- Q
Login with
Facebook
Google
Sign up