8 megapixel mega shootout: Picture this
Motorola RAZR XT910 review: Through thick and thinMotorola Motocubo A45 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.0
- Features
-
7.8
- Performance
-
7.7
- Cecil
- Report
- 0
==" What's wrong with the people at Motorola?? It's ugly and expensive. Nobody will buy it. It looks like some cheap knockoff phone. Motorola should fire their designers..
- Reply
- 2009-10-05 09:16
- uCj4
- C
- Direwolf_65
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-04 07:08 from vGj7 - click to readMost any phone that is not a smart phone is for social purposes. Most smart phones is for business, and you will be charged for data, for having a smart phone.....even if you don't use it for business. Which sucks. But at any rate, if you want a keyboard on your phone, it is either one or the other. Which , by the way, you dont need to be a 'kid' to be soical.
:-)
- Reply
- 2009-10-04 08:06
- kaLJ
- R
- Direwolf_65
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2009-10-04 02:05 from psmj - click to readDo you??
Or do you think that the way you think is the only way to think??
- Reply
- 2009-10-04 07:59
- kaLJ
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I cannot say it is ugly
It is a decent design. Necessary design. Many people will not think crazy about design. With design you can only get praise words, but will not get the necessary usage and business.
-- The most important is the essential futures. This phone can do well as a social phone that is cheap.
-- Kids can surely take this phone.
Don't forget now days people think of buying only necessary features. Design is not much concern!!!
- Reply
- 2009-10-04 07:08
- vGj7
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
One more useless phone!!! Does Motorola knows that they still live on a Planet call Earth????
- Reply
- 2009-10-04 02:05
- psmj
- U
- Direwolf_65
- Report
- 0
> In reply to ced @ 2009-10-02 09:18 from w0QN - click to readThat is what alot of people said about the QA1, But my wife loves the phone, and I was impressed with it also. So dont knock it till you try it.
- Reply
- 2009-10-03 17:24
- kaLJ
- U
- Dan
- Report
- 0
Remember the Motorola V3? That day, Motorola killed it's lead designer and never filled that post. This phone is sooooooo ULGYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply
- 2009-10-03 09:01
- mt0q
- U
- ced
- Report
- 0
WTF! a very big mess. please dont waste ur money on this. poor features. disgusting look. and QWERTY then slide! MONKEYS! damn!
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 09:18
- w0QN
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
good look
nice features for access to social network
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 08:52
- Mfxm
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
i think that it is still too expensive for the features it provides.
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 07:10
- fqyX
- U
- your mom
- Report
- 0
I'm amazed that most of the people that express their opinions here can actually write, because I'm pretty sure they can't think...
- Reply
- 2009-10-02 01:58
- TqYx
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
The only positive thing I can say about this phone would have to be the battery life, which is pretty good when it comes to a mobile phone.
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 23:59
- 5%X9
- U
- shak
- Report
- 0
I think Moto design this model for kids....anyways looks nice.
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 21:42
- tU36
- U
- Jaz
- Report
- 0
Looks like copy of Nokia Twist.. but without twist :)
i hope it performs well
last time i checked a motorola mobile (Pebl) it looked nice but didnt do well
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 21:36
- tTfa
- U
- Harsh Anjaria
- Report
- 0
what the hell??? no wifi , no 3g... no touch nothing.. and above all i cant understand the shape.. how one would hold the phone???? too awkward..
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 21:24
- 2S}d
- U
- Onindo Ahmed
- Report
- 0
I was a fond of Motorola when I used Motosilver L7 and Motorazr V3i several years ago...But now I it's producing ugly and backdated phones...This one is a symbol of uglyness...Very bad looking...Low specifications compared to price tag.I think Nokia and Samsung are doing well.SE is not bad too.
- Reply
- 2009-10-01 21:22
- Pxxd
- C
