Samsung Galaxy Note N7000 review: Power play 
Nokia Lumia 800 review: New beginningsSiemens C65 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.9
- Features
-
7.7
- Performance
-
7.6
- MAGO
- Report
- 0
oohoohhoh remember it phone...was and wil my best phone....
- Reply
- 2012-01-24 21:12
- IaV$
- U
- hotrodnealy
- Report
- 0
This phone is actually great. I had a phone like this about 3 years ago. But i have used it for 4 years and its amazing that it didn't require me to have a maintaainance for this phone. But its battery life is so short that i have to charge it every 5 hours. TAKE NOTE: without using it!! But this phone is so good..I like to have one again..:))
- Reply
- 2011-12-13 09:24
- P@dH
- U
- Ryan
- Report
- 0
I actually own one, well the CV version, first time I got it was in 2004 and it still works pretty well, the only issue I had with it was the short life spam of the battery, changed like 2 since then, and it's been used till 2008, less often after that
- Reply
- 2011-06-07 02:25
- nDIB
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Stupid phone! No really! Very short bat. life. VERY buggy. It stoped working after one of those bugs..., it just froze up.. Sad, cuz I kinda liked the animations and the loud speaker there( Worked less then a year for me..
- Reply
- 2011-04-12 22:07
- IBLD
- H
- jason24589
- Report
- 0
This phone sucks! My father got this phone but it keeps freezing. Now, my father got a Nokia 2600 classic last year. No more Siemens mobile.
- Reply
- 2010-10-27 11:23
- t7Rg
- C
- Kevin
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Danedesta @ 2010-08-28 14:15 from 0V{8 - click to readWhat about the battery life? B/cos I used one in d past but it's battery life was very short.
- Reply
- 2010-08-30 20:51
- fsV9
- R
- Kevin
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Danedesta @ 2010-08-28 14:15 from 0V{8 - click to readWhat about the battery life? B/cos I used one in d past but it's battery life was very low.
- Reply
- 2010-08-30 20:24
- fsV9
- R
- HongPham
- Report
- 0
Yes, it's very good and strong, I've use it for 7 years, can you believe?
But the battery power leaks too quickly, I have to recharge it nearly everyday.
- Reply
- 2010-03-31 15:21
- trst
- U
- Tanzim Ahammed
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Mario Rozzo @ 2009-04-27 08:38 from TuE4 - click to readthat is best i used it in 5 years
- Reply
- 2010-03-25 06:54
- Mfxe
- R
- Pillows Man
- Report
- 0
that phone rules!!!. i use that for 4 years... and a day... it's die T_T. but, is a really good phone.
- Reply
- 2010-02-24 11:02
- iBtv
- C
- FAHiM
- Report
- 0
Simply an awesome phn. Used for 5years. Battery is a shit but again why do need to own a battery for 5+ years. Changed once. Still running. Wish they had upgraded this model :(
- Reply
- 2009-12-22 08:35
- PS2B
- F
- sergiu23
- Report
- 0
Very good phone,i had one for about 2-3 years, the bad part is the battery. 600 mAh is too low and it wears off very quick. it should have 800 mah at least.
- Reply
- 2009-11-07 20:03
- nDGK
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to My Mother Frank @ 2009-07-03 09:53 from nQax - click to readyour right, Ive been using my cv65 for nearly 5 years and i still love it. battery does go flat quite quickly though. Its the only mobilr ive ever owned and still no plans to replace it.
- Reply
- 2009-11-05 14:23
- pK5J
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
I am using this phone right now and it is not actually that bad except the battery life is kind of short.
- Reply
- 2009-10-19 00:22
- YcrG
- U
- dai
- Report
- 0
bought this for $20, with the DCA510 cable. after some Vklay-ing, now the phone has 14MB memory, run Opera Mini 5 beta flawlessly, and play full song track after converting it to IMA ADPCM 8Khz. The keypad is good for fast texters like me, except the small "2" that gets too close to the Wap key. Cons including the battery life, but overall, I recommend this phone.
- Reply
- 2009-09-20 03:12
- PFxQ
- H
