VK Mobile VK4500 - user opinions and reviews

VK Mobile

Voting results

Design
7.9
Features
7.3
Performance
7.3
Votes:
312
 Hits:
130146

Wow! This is the only other phone besides the Nokia N95 that has the inset slider mechanism (the upper half is "sunk into" the lower half of the phone). Phone Manufacturers should look into this. I'm sure they could develop a slimmer version of the Pantech 2-way slider.

  • Reply
  • 2008-06-30 19:32
  • 4QjA
  • C

i couldnt connect to the internet on this phone either. did anyone find out the problem?

  • Reply
  • 2008-05-12 23:19
  • agSd
  • U

pretty phone.could not help but fall for it. however there is a aproblem.I cant connect to the internet.somebody send me the internet settings. Please.

  • Reply
  • 2008-04-06 22:38
  • N9@7
  • U

How do you get music to this phone

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-06 21:35
  • 0Y7S
  • U

I washed my Motorola so I bought VK cuz it was cheap and look good! (only $100.00)
That was a big mistake!
It shows signal (bars) but you are talking to no one!hard to use!
Never want to try something new again!

  • Reply
  • 2008-02-06 06:39
  • 4YEM
  • U

DO NOT buy VK!!!!
IT's the worst machine I've seen !
It has NOTHING but an unique face!
The worst machine from a pretty pretty company!

  • Reply
  • 2007-12-24 18:55
  • ULH%
  • U

I've just bought this phone yesterday. I like the design of this phone. It is unique. My previous phone was V220 Motorola. And I think I would prefer the previous one than this phone for the speed. The features of vk4500 are complete enought to be smart a phone with low price. The camera is not too bad with resolution max 1280x960.
The video is not in 3gp format or mp4, so I could not open the file with the standard software in my computer. The battery survived only about 24 hours for the maximum use. And it is easy to be warmer when I used it in more than 2 minutes. The speaker is good, and the earphone also very good. When I was transmitting data to the computer by bluetooth, the speed was very slow. I must be patient. And the report, I still dont get the answer for that, the delivery report. The overal, I still like this phone for the design and the cheap price. only about 125USD in a nice pack box with accesories.

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-29 19:15
  • PFyG
  • U

i,ve just bought the phone, well, looks nice to me (design - menu interface-speed access), but is it java compatible??, yes, it,s has java game, but i cannot intall any java applets, ex : opera mini. it tells me that the *.jar file not found on the provider. can some one tell me how to install java applications into this phone. htx

  • Reply
  • 2007-11-29 09:34
  • wrbL
  • U

what the?? is this a fone or a toy?? if u people want slim and lightweght designs go for samsung with "jampack" features and if ever im gonna buy this ill give to my nanny it sooo cheap!!! what a backwarded fone this is, come to japan and korea and bring this fone people there will lough at you. ^.^

  • Reply
  • 2007-10-15 11:43
  • vxgV
  • U

Dear sir,

I am using Ur Vk4500 product and I found it very nice and very convinient to carry.

My VK 4500 developed problem of locking and also does not display information when switched on.

how can this be repaird also I would like you to improve on the battery of VK4500 to last longer.

My younger brother bought for me from abroad and I reside in Nigeria. Every one seems to admire my VK and were interested in buy but it can't be found in any Nigeria market.

Thanks

  • Reply
  • 2007-05-25 13:29
  • iJYA
  • U

not a fan of vk mobile but i gotta tell u guys that this phones design is uniq among other phone models ... good luck vk mobile wtg ...

  • Reply
  • 2007-04-01 05:51
  • w9Lj
  • U

an odd design indeed. it's too bad we dont have VK here

  • Reply
  • 2007-02-23 03:12
  • 2Am$
  • U

the design is pure fenomenal

  • Reply
  • 2006-12-12 01:41
  • nDGN
  • U

never thought vk would make a phone like this its alright for a person who doesnt use phone that much and 1.3 megapixel camera like samsung d500. its like d500 but a cheaper version....

  • Reply
  • 2006-11-07 22:36
  • ppxW
  • U

wowzers this phone is ace, its odd that the ones they come up with by themselves are really good, youd think they didnt need to copy designs. :s

  • Reply
  • 2006-07-25 13:01
  • mEn%
  • U

veri nais...ghet `im

  • Reply
  • 2006-06-17 11:32
  • mA{k
  • U

cool...gettim

  • Reply
  • 2006-06-17 11:31
  • mA{k
  • U

A samsung imposter, GETTIM!!!!

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-17 17:57
  • TkyE
  • U

This phone looks great but the other opinions are wrong to say about this slim
sexy mobile that was dear who could be so MEAN.

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-11 10:42
  • x{Wp
  • U

vvv sexi

  • Reply
  • 2006-05-06 15:44
  • i4bJ
  • U

Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.