Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.3
- Features
-
7.0
- Performance
-
7.1
- Anonymous
- Report
One problem with V9 is the Bluetooth.
Hardly getting the connection if somebody wanted to transfer to you.BUt if you are the one searching...well its very fast.
Unless Moto & Moto..
If Moto & Sony worst...
But if V3 no problem...
TeeKAY* Medan Mara* KL
- Reply
- 2008-11-07 05:30
- TS$w
- U
- OrangPizza
- Report
This phone is great and all, but I still think the old RAZR looks better.
- Reply
- 2008-11-07 04:03
- ib69
- U
- Bernie - BIG V9 Fan!
- Report
> In reply to apt.pupil @ 2008-11-03 01:05 from 2GLkVideo calling is initiated with phone open then close and use 2Mp Camera and external screen (same size/quality as internal screen). Good image for video calling.
The V9 is my 3rd Motorola model (V3X, V6) - I'll never buy a Nokia again!
- Reply
- 2008-11-06 09:09
- PP$8
- R
- JR
- Report
I going to buy this phone because it's slim, sleek and stylish unlike the nokia brick phones that doesn't even fit your pocket. Whooo!!! I love this phone!!!
- Reply
- 2008-11-06 06:00
- 2AmR
- U
- something
- Report
> In reply to apt.pupil @ 2008-11-03 01:05 from 2GLkthe V9 can do video calls.. you close the phone and use the 2mp camera for it
- Reply
- 2008-11-06 01:51
- PP$8
- R
- 100 Moto
- Report
> In reply to apt.pupil @ 2008-11-03 01:05 from 2GLkCorrect me if I'm wrong, as a V9 user, not that I agree with the design, my understanding is V9 does support video calls through the external (and only) camera.
I asked Moto how it works, it says after I press the v-call button, close the flip immediately and I can v-call through the external cam...
That's why I'm still using my good old V3maxx i-mode which offers a secondary cam for v-call.
- Reply
- 2008-11-06 01:24
- Er2M
- R
- apt.pupil
- Report
> In reply to motofan @ 2008-11-02 17:19 from wHSHwell for a feature phone- i noticed an immediate lack of a video call camera, and that it's new UI only goes skin deep. once you get into doing more advanced stuff on the phone- it shows typical motorola behaviors.
i think this is a good phone for people who only really want to make phone calls and store images. The camera on it is barely B-grade. the images have a horrid contrast.
i know all this because i sell the phones and have just spent an hour playing with one to fully delve into it's fewatures so i can sell it's good points.
- Reply
- 2008-11-03 01:05
- 2GLk
- R
- jenny
- Report
> In reply to Almon @ 2008-10-25 11:18 from PG}Di think u talk about Motorola here right?
- Reply
- 2008-11-02 20:15
- jbP0
- R
- motofan
- Report
stylish phone
best performance
this v9 are latest generation system with fast OS
dont compare it with the old generation becoz of slow OS
if you say so, probably you are using the old.
the os is optimize for performance and feature
the best thing with this phone are touch screen on external screen with haptic technology
- Reply
- 2008-11-02 17:19
- wHSH
- U
- Buckie
- Report
I've been running a V9 now for about 3 mths ... battery life is great 5-7 days without bluetooth and about 3 days when running it with the S9 headset or the T505 carkit ... best moto so far but will have to wait for the V9x
- Reply
- 2008-11-02 05:56
- vxCc
- U
- Avatar
- Report
> In reply to BApe @ 2008-10-23 11:26 from M@T2The V3 is everything a user could want, It is STILL the BEST SELLING PHONE, Sure the N93 has better features but considering the V3 has the features, Looks, size and affordability more people bought it,
Though I do also have to admit that since then Motorola haven't been the same at all
- Reply
- 2008-11-01 21:36
- 32@m
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
Darn it, I was hoping for a FM-radio...GPS is a plus, but a radio would make this music phone complete...and I may have just bought one...
- Reply
- 2008-10-26 13:27
- nSHG
- C
- rajja
- Report
its aphone with worst performance as its processing speed is very slow.
- Reply
- 2008-10-25 20:06
- upeJ
- C
- Almon
- Report
> In reply to BApe @ 2008-10-23 11:26 from M@T2Hey, Nokia sucks you know. Boring design, boring features and stuff and Nokia is cheap too you know. Also, you could get the same features and more with other manufacturers like this one by just changing models. You're left with a stylish and feature rich phone...
-unlike Nokia, It's feature rich but it's ugly and it's a brick!!! It's better to have them both.
- Reply
- 2008-10-25 11:18
- PG}D
- R
- carphone manager
- Report
> In reply to BApe @ 2008-10-23 11:26 from M@T2no way has the n95 outsold the v3...i work in mobile retail; when the v3 first came out and we sold loads of them for years...not months but years... people still come in asking for them now even... they wont be asking for the n95 years down the line trust me....
- Reply
- 2008-10-24 12:40
- 0ya$
- R
- 100 Moto
- Report
> In reply to BApe @ 2008-10-23 11:26 from M@T2Believe when V3 was first available, nobody was dare to make such "slim" flip phone...
And look at the almighty brand's "attempt" on the slim flip phone market with its N76...I've heard many shops stop selling this phone due to quality problems.
If V3 doesn't look good when it was first release, how come so many people rushed to get a copy? From what I remember, the original V3 cost more than US$300 (if not more). So why people didn't rush to get an N93?
Ask your gf or wife or mother or mother-in-law or grandma and see if she wants to carry a "brick" N93 or a "light" V3?
- Reply
- 2008-10-24 02:27
- Er2M
- R
- Cristo
- Report
I have a moto V8 and it can barely get thruogh a full day with the battery life. This V9x won't get me through half my day. Whats up with that MOTO.
- Reply
- 2008-10-23 23:29
- LxF1
- U
- BApe
- Report
> In reply to 100 Moto @ 2008-10-23 02:35 from Er2MSo what if V3 sold? It was cheap with cheap hardware, the N93 was expensive and was feature rich. The N93i is beautiful, it looked much better than the cheap poor people V3. So what if N93 was a brick, i'd rather have that and be satisfied than take some boring and useless V3. N93 didnt sell a lot cause it was expensive, BUT the N95 OUT SOLD THE V3! Hahaha!
- Reply
- 2008-10-23 11:26
- M@T2
- R
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed