Nokia 808 PureView in focus: Interview with D. Dinning
Apple iPad 3 review: Hotter than everMotorola WX160 - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.0
- Features
-
6.6
- Performance
-
6.8
- rick
- Report
- 0
hi, just interested in the battery life. how long until it needs to be recharged after little or no use and how long does it take to charge. thank you. rick.
- Reply
- 2010-03-10 03:35
- wgIU
- Q
- abc.........
- Report
- 0
ahhhhhhhhhhhhh.....guys its its best phone. i bought it and m very happy with it.
- Reply
- 2010-02-20 19:29
- uWyn
- H
- Allah dino Khan Bhay
- Report
- 0
it is a very good mobile phone, I purchased it and happy
- Reply
- 2010-02-11 10:24
- IaHi
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to rahman @ 2009-11-19 11:21 from wrqq - click to readI was just going to say that. Looks totally good for a cheap phone. Sleek and serious, not like a toy.
- Reply
- 2009-12-23 19:43
- Mtr2
- R
- allan
- Report
- 0
Reasonable price with additional FM radio and hand-free too. Great value.
- Reply
- 2009-12-23 10:53
- vtKy
- H
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
its slim and nice but the features are so bare...i think Motorola is targeting at no-frill market.
- Reply
- 2009-12-04 07:51
- jiWR
- U
- Sako
- Report
- 0
marketing strategies yah know. for me moto is one of the best when it comes to innovation. they are producing low end fones for those who can't afford. everyone has all the rights to use a moto fone anyways...
- Reply
- 2009-11-02 05:35
- tWiH
- U
- John Rak
- Report
- 0
I bought it for 3,490 Philppine peso. (ALCATEL OT-i650)
Its battery indicator has
3 bars.
The phone lost one bar after 2 days
of heavy texting. No calls.
The phone lost one bar after
3 days if i turn the antenna off mode.
Heavy txting no calls.
- Reply
- 2009-11-01 19:03
- 2A3G
- H
- john rak
- Report
- 0
I agree it looks like one of alcatel phone. Im a die hard alcatel user.
It looks like this
http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...203-2843.php
http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...103-2842.php
My phone??
http://www.gsmarena.com/alcate...pro-2285.php
..
- Reply
- 2009-10-29 20:54
- 2A3G
- U
- Rob
- Report
- 0
Why the hell are gsmarena posting these aweful phones up here when moto have officailly announced the DROID??? Get with the times GSM.
- Reply
- 2009-10-28 16:47
- nGG5
- U
- subrota karmoker
- Report
- 0
motorola alws produced disgstng model.......n software should b more dvloped.
- Reply
- 2009-10-27 17:25
- uNVA
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to chaser_xsnes9x @ 2009-10-26 20:25 from kJXC - click to read@chaser_xsnes9x:
These are not manufactured by Motroola, they are Alcatel phones with Moto branding. Motorola no longer makes their low end phones.
Where did you find this information?
- Reply
- 2009-10-27 13:50
- 0UsH
- R
- dave
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Prem Kumar @ 2009-10-26 13:06 from w4H4 - click to readBecause motorola want to touch those who are in developing country and for those who just need basic function of mobilephone: communication in light design (mobile) with good battery performance. I think i need this phone.
- Reply
- 2009-10-27 10:15
- tDT{
- R
- chaser_xsnes9x
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Prem Kumar @ 2009-10-26 13:06 from w4H4 - click to readThese are not manufactured by Motroola, they are Alcatel phones with Moto branding. Motorola no longer makes their low end phones.
- Reply
- 2009-10-26 20:25
- kJXC
- R
