Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
7.4
- Features
-
7.1
- Performance
-
7.1
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to ar @ 2009-05-20 08:09 from pd9WThey should try to change the design. It's booring.
- Reply
- 2009-05-21 00:58
- pk%M
- R
- elina
- Report
the upgrade is only 5mp n the material..the design is still the same..but why no wifi n 3.5g??better choose 6260..
- Reply
- 2009-05-20 02:21
- ji{R
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
battery life is only 4 hours ahahahhaahhaah. Same old cra...p!
- Reply
- 2009-05-20 01:46
- 4BbB
- U
- Sal
- Report
Interesting Nokia putting 3.5mm jack on all devices, on the other hand SonyEricsson havnt got any with them on.
- Reply
- 2009-05-20 01:24
- 0RF%
- U
- God_Of_War
- Report
nice phone hope it is affordable to customers go nokia..
- Reply
- 2009-05-19 19:50
- PvW1
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
i can't see why nokia came out with this phone. it's almost identical to http://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_...ide-2613.php , only that 6600i misses the WLAN and GPS.
i can say though, the new grey colour is pretty nice, but they could have kept the specs as 6260 slide, and name it 6260i.
- Reply
- 2009-05-19 19:45
- 0Up%
- U
- Big Boy
- Report
Why this phone? The typical female buyer of this phone doesn't care at all about 3,2 mpix or 5 mpix camera. They should make a complete new phone.
- Reply
- 2009-05-19 18:20
- 36uP
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.


RSS feed