Nokia 6700 classic - user opinions and reviews
Check Price
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.2
- Features
-
7.9
- Performance
-
7.9
- Zobi
- Report
I like. I hope it is metal like 6300 is very nice!
Why no come sooner? Q3 2009 is too late, then no one cares.
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 22:33
- CatF
- U
- Amitabh syed
- Report
man the 6300 was a successor ... it seems like this one is also going to be a big hit cause the specifications are above average, but what only lacking is the wifi........ hope another version comes out with the wifi ......
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 21:39
- PA$k
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
man the 6300 was a successor ... it seems like this one is also going to be a big hit coz the specifications are above average, but what only lacking is the wi-fi........ hope another version comes out with the wi-fi .......
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 21:37
- PA$k
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
same old designs what the hell is nokia thinking. i will never use nokia again
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 20:36
- ft0t
- U
- Sal
- Report
very good strategy. Here some reasons for not having a few things;
1. No WIFI: The fone is targeted at current users of 6300 which it is set to replace, those who bought 6300 were looking for slim, stylish easytouse fone who didnt really bother for WIFI
2.No 3.5mm jack: It may have or may not aint sure but again for 6300 users ive come across they had no idea (most of them) what the 3.5mm jack is.
3. Nseries and 5xxx series normally have 3.5mm jack for such series users want decent music quality. If u r one of them this prob isnt for you. Its for those who just want megapixels, sleek and beautiful body
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 20:27
- 0RAq
- U
- Vladimir
- Report
One more thing worth mentioning...does this phone have a 3.5mm audio jack like the 6303 Classic.
If not, that would really be a shame.
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 19:39
- juCB
- U
- Vladimir
- Report
Compared to Nokia's other phones, this one finally uses high-quality materials.
The only exception is the 8800 Arte series, which are VERY expensive.
Also, S40 is great! It is simple, fast and easy to use.
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 19:37
- juCB
- U
- Vladimir
- Report
> In reply to jenerio @ 2009-01-29 15:46 from TIE7Touchscreens are NOT practical!
Most people still prefer to use keypads!
Overall, a very nice phone.
Wi-fi would be pointless on such a small screen.
It is also important to note that when Nokia released the 6300, they released the 6301 with Wi-fi shortly after that.
They will probably do the same with this phone.
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 19:34
- juCB
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
> In reply to Flo @ 2009-01-29 18:17 from pqxaNext month
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 19:24
- ji{R
- R
- Qatar
- Report
Looking same as nokia 6300
camera is 5 mega but no WiFi so don't go for this
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 19:14
- 0C3k
- C
- Anonymous
- Report
what is good for a GPS chip inside if there's no symbian on it? Just fancy like iphones ?
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 18:58
- 0Ukg
- U
- Flo
- Report
Finally, a beefed up Nokia that is slim and resembles the 6300. But when will Nokia introduce an 8 MP camera to their phones ?
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 18:17
- pqxa
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
Using wi-fi on screens less than 2.6" is horrible for a serious browsing .but a fancy phone with 5 mp camera is good to have that too at a good price .anyways, gps is there as an accesory.
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 17:35
- vw2G
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
This phone looks very nice, but I don't understand why Nokia keeps insisting on releasing mobile phones without WLAN. Why put a GPS on such a small display phone and no WLAN?
Nokia has a really great phones but big disadvantages for them: NO WLAN!
I really don't get it!
- Reply
- 2009-01-29 16:26
- mY9L
- U
Note: Sponsored advertising links are in green.
RSS feed