Nokia N9 review: Once in a lifetime
8 megapixel mega shootout: Picture thisPhilips Xenium K600 - user opinions and reviews
Popularity
Voting results
- Design
-
8.5
- Features
-
8.3
- Performance
-
8.4
- jp
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Wentyl @ 2010-11-21 22:09 from mKf8 - click to readformat factory
- Reply
- 2011-10-01 20:09
- v$Bs
- R
- deepak agarwal india
- Report
- 0
I feel philips is good phone but this phone is not like old philips xeniam metal
- Reply
- 2010-12-23 05:02
- 3sE3
- U
- deepak agarwal india
- Report
- 0
I feel philips is good phone but this phone is not like old philips xeniam metal
- Reply
- 2010-12-23 05:02
- 3sE3
- U
- Ashraph
- Report
- 0
> In reply to afagjoi @ 2010-08-10 18:16 from PXKH - click to readi agree for u u r absltily right
- Reply
- 2010-09-30 22:20
- uCrf
- R
- afagjoi
- Report
- 0
Very nice phone products from Philips, but... what about 3G network support? Come on... 3G network support is very important in North America market (and Worldwide, I guess).
- Reply
- 2010-08-10 18:16
- PXKH
- C
- abhishek
- Report
- 0
i cant find any philips showroom in noida to buy this phone
- Reply
- 2010-07-20 16:04
- 2@cA
- U
- maso
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-05-13 12:39 from PDEk - click to readPhilips continues to produce, through its joint venture with CEC, established 15 years ago!
- Reply
- 2010-07-18 13:00
- 0NKk
- R
- W4L4CH1
- Report
- 0
Hmm. I don't get it if any of you are hate Phillips mobile product, but as a consumer I still choose Phillips for his long lasting battery that still unbeatable. If you think that are other product that developing their mobile and not forgetting about their long lasting battery like Phillips, than mention it to me... I'll buy it instead of Phillips. Even Phillips could give you a regular feature, it's just enough for a regular activity. Well who want's a high technology mobile phone anyway. If you have mostly charge it several time's a day. It's an advantages if you can use your mobile phone without think about "Have I charge it yet?"
- Reply
- 2010-06-22 06:17
- wrdG
- C
- freaky people
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Anonymous @ 2010-05-13 12:39 from PDEk - click to readso what?:))) who cares who is boss of the Philips-es factoryes? that is one kool phone made by a company named Philips....what more are u interested in?
- Reply
- 2010-05-14 06:50
- 0Cau
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Philips do not make phones anymore. Someone in China bought their brand name to make phones (please google you can find it)
- Reply
- 2010-05-13 12:39
- PDEk
- U
- Taurus
- Report
- 0
No one is gona buy this phone...why phillps wasting time n money on makiting it...better do wht they are good at..not sure wht ;)
- Reply
- 2010-05-13 06:05
- KRZW
- U
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
Why a disgrace? It's a phone first and foremost, and for calls and text messaging (for which a phone is primarily designed to do) this should be more than enough. Add on top of that a 30-day battery life, and you have a great phone for frequent travellers. Lack of 850MHz band means you can't use this phone in some parts of the United States, and lack of 3G means you can't use this phone in Japan or South Korea. Those are my biggest gripe. Lack of 3G is not a big issue. Most email messages and data are comprised of text, which should transfer just fine over GPRS.
- Reply
- 2010-05-13 02:07
- uEA0
- R
- Gaul
- Report
- 0
a decent phone , it have something attractive , and I don't know what :D
- Reply
- 2010-05-13 01:10
- LaAL
- C
- Sasa
- Report
- 0
What`s with Philips , are they all gone insane ?? These specs are a disgrace !
- Reply
- 2010-05-12 17:54
- 3805
- U
- Barcode
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Pyramid Head @ 2010-03-24 20:21 from Q}m9 - click to readSarcasm?
- Reply
- 2010-05-12 17:10
- j8LN
- R
- Anonymous
- Report
- 0
> In reply to Pyramid Head @ 2010-03-24 20:21 from Q}m9 - click to readHuh! Are you kidding!
- Reply
- 2010-05-12 11:23
- YdgE
- R
