Most of the chinese smartphones have 4G band 20(800).
Thats the reason not to buy Xiaomi till they change their specs
326 ppi is "retina" said Apple ... so a better ppi is just enough except using it as a VR screen.
23086saurabhkumar, 16 May 2016Which company makes lowers with a pocket size in which mi max can fit? How will you carry that... moreso what you think some people buy ipad mini or many 7' tablet? just talk about the spec of this phone and imho it's not good with the ppi.
Which company makes lowers with a pocket size in which mi max can fit? How will you carry that giant in your pocket ? How can you handle this phone single handedly? These questions are enough to overshadow the specifications of this product . One should rather buy the the redmi note 3 which is handy instead
badan, 16 May 20161080p is a 2k Display FYI,No mate
1k is 1080p
2k is 1440p
4k is 2160p
badan, 16 May 20161080p is a 2k Display FYI,It's just Full HD not 2k
Nops in 1080 the screen res is 1920x1080 and in 2K screen res. is 2048x1080.
MobiFix, 15 May 2016no 2k screen weak cpu no usb c It's sad to see those specifications.
MobiFix, 15 May 2016no 2k screen weak cpu no usb c 1080p is a 2k Display FYI,
naap51d, 13 May 2016Unless you are a "pixel peeper" type that has super resolution eyes, all those tight specs on ... moreWhen using Google CardBoard or VR naturally we'are pixels peeper. But I won't argue since it's not flagship and offering good pricing.
Just, 3 out of 5 friends in my office have burned Mi phones after charging with other chargers (let's say Sammy's or ASUS's). The culprits include Mi3 and Mi4i. The power rating shall not be much different. The burned parts is power module which I believe has bad protection. Be aware and use only official charger from Xiaomi.
MobiFix, 15 May 2016no 2k screen weak cpu no usb c It's a midrange not a flagship & you will pay around 299USD in china to the 4GB RAM.
a1dahiya, 13 May 2016yah! who says its double the price of mi max. every thing counts hardware quality, they fit ... moreYou are right in few things but you can't add the Pro because GSMA didn't give all the specifications about the phone so I will compare the Max vs A9
1- Low price vs high price
2- 6.44" vs 6.0"
3- 74.8% vs 75.9% It's not easy to get a high screen-to-body ratio if you will go bigger so Samsung will go lower than 75.9%
4- Q1.8+Q1.4 vs Q1.8+Q1.2
5- 4GB RAM vs 3GB RAM
6- 128GB vs 32GB
7- 200GB vs 128GB
8- 4850mAh vs 4000mAh (20% more)
9- 203g vs 200g so it's super light with a big battery.
10- No idea about the main camera but I think the A9 will be better for selfie.
11- Infrared port available vs not available.
Koekje, 11 May 2016Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro is also easily two times more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Max. Is an ex... moreyah! who says its double the price of mi max. every thing counts hardware quality, they fit in 5000 mah battery in 6" screen, mi max doesn't have ois camera, phone style, build quality, software screen optimisation, galaxy a9 with 4000mah battery delivers much longer battery life than your mi max with 4850 mah, price will be around 25000, galaxy pro has dedicated sd card slot.screen to body ratio of a9 pro is 78% while mi max has 74%. after sale service of xiaomi is pathetic in india, Europe and other countries of America. and you still argue............! what guts you have.....bravo...!