Apple said the iPhone 4s.....reception is better then iPhone 4.i m using 4s for last 1 month and find the reception is not good.i used i4 before n think i4 reception is better.the 4s reception signal drops all the time....like when I make a call it's reception getting lower( 4-3 rec bars).sometimes searcing for network.can anyone facing this problem?
[deleted post]Come on dude Directive 4 you can do it... We all believe in you.
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012I guess you think you know more than the US patent office, Since you think they were wrong in... more Tell you what... You look into the history of patent law since it's beginning and you gonna find endless occasions of ideas being stolen and patented by someone else, and I know you still incapable of understanding it but there is a big difference between legal and actual truth, and I'd take you serious he you could understand that.
Nonsense... when you start recording video. it's cannot PAUSE... bullshit...!! same as samsung... nokia is more better...
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012Yes, normal people use the law and common senseJust wondering if OCP has become a subsidiary of Apple now? Because that would mean your programmed directives are:
1. "Serve the Apple trust"
2. "Protect the Apple"
3. "Uphold the Apple"
4. (Classified)............... "Never oppose an Apple officer"
And when you realised IPhone was a rip off you I believe directive 4 kicked in and you were taken in for programming.
Android Dan, 02 Jun 2012For over a day after you found out iPhone design was a rip off you stopped saying it after you... moreI guess you think you know more than the US patent office,
Since you think they were wrong in issuing the IPhone design and interface patent.
So many people like you yell their innocence when they get dragged to the penitentiary
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012That is what they were and areFor over a day after you found out iPhone design was a rip off you stopped saying it after you were saying it in almost every comment and I thought there was hope for you yet that you were capable of learning something negative about Apple, but I was wrong and I guess your last Firmware upgrade deleted that user information.
Android Dan, 02 Jun 2012Back to the plastic copies then?That is what they were and are
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012Yes, in the courtrooms Apple is litigating the plastic copies Here trolls write BSBack to the plastic copies then?
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012This forum is all about the pros and cons of the LG Prada copy and not a litigation courtroom ... moreYes, in the courtrooms Apple is litigating the plastic copies
Here trolls write BS
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012Abnormal people post repeated comments over and over and over again.Exactly what you do
its a great phone with many of the desired features.... I'm using this phone for 3 months only, and i think i'll not be able to change my phone now....... Hope for a greater phone from iphonesss...... :
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012Read the law and stop posting rubbish: The prior art is defined by Title 35, United States ... moreThis forum is all about the pros and cons of the LG Prada copy and not a litigation courtroom for legal arguments.
Android Dan, 02 Jun 2012Dude this forum isn't a courtroom, trying to use legal technicalities to prove you right means... moreNormal people buy Apple shares and Apple phones and the success is obvious
Trolls that cannot stand that success write like you write.
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012Read the law and stop posting rubbish: The prior art is defined by Title 35, United States ... moreDude this forum isn't a courtroom, trying to use legal technicalities to prove you right means nothing because normal people deal in actual truth not the legal kind, and the actual truth is the iPhone is a rip off of the LG Prada.
Anonymous, 02 Jun 2012The LG Prada copy league.Read the law and stop posting rubbish:
The prior art is defined by Title 35, United States Code, Section 102, which states: "A person shall be entitled to a patent unless...." This language is followed by a series of definitions, the most important of which are summarized in the following.
First, a person is not entitled to a patent if the invention was "known or used by others in this country, or was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country" before the date of invention by the applicant for the patent. If, for example, an invention is known or is being used by someone in the United States, another person who makes the same invention at a later date may not obtain a patent.