GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

888k

156k
74k
1.1m

RSS

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • DealsNew
  • Tools
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENTS

Counterclockwise: tracking battery growth over the years

  • Post your comment
  • Comments (40)

Peter 12 November 2017

Counterclockwise

As smartphones replaced feature phones, battery endurance went in the gutter. And even after so many years, a day of between charges is what most people get – at least the people that don’t want to live with battery anxiety.

However the data proves that battery tech has progressed greatly. In fact, it won’t be wrong to describe a modern smartphone as a battery with a screen and motherboard tacked on.

We picked the Top 50 most popular phones from our database for each year and averaged the ratio of battery capacity to phone volume. In short, the chart below shows how many milliamp hours a phone has per cubic centimeter (mAh/cm³).

As you can see, a 2017 phone has 7 times higher energy density compared to a phone from the year 2000. The green line is the trendline, which shows that the this ratio is growing exponentially.

It’s true that phones have gotten bigger in volume over the years, pushed by ever-larger screens. But at the same time more and more of the internal volume is occupied by the battery.

Apple had to use two batteries on the iPhone X to maximize capacity, while LG has been making stacked batteries for years to conform to the curved backs of phones at the time.

Many (us included) complain when we see a thin phone with a small battery, but we have to give it to the engineers – they make the best out of what the designers give them.

L-shaped battery in iPhone X (photo source) LG's stacked battery
L-shaped battery in iPhone X (photo source) • LG's stacked battery

Last week we told you how heat limits performance and wished for active cooling. But that’s just a geeky wish, it’s pretty clear that even if cooling is solved, the next bottleneck will be the battery – graphics might run really cool, but what use is that when the battery dies in an hour.

Related articles
  • Counterclockwise: console-quality graphics on phones Counterclockwise: console-quality graphics on phones
  • Counterclockwise: going from squarish screens to widescreen Counterclockwise: going from squarish screens to widescreen
  • Counterclockwise: plotting the average camera resolution through the years Counterclockwise: plotting the average camera resolution through the years
  • Counterclockwise: the rise and fall of smartphone brands Counterclockwise: the rise and fall of smartphone brands

Reader comments

e
  • eddy-
  • CAg
  • 03 Aug 2018

Very well said.

  • Reply
D
  • AnonD-441601
  • mKH
  • 10 Dec 2017

Well if Tesla sportscar can be run on like 7000+ notebook batteries which weights 2 tons i would like to see a phone working on like 2 notebook batteries i bet on such a small screen the battery would last several weeks until it die :-)

  • Reply
A
  • Adiyel
  • Ibx
  • 14 Nov 2017

The real test of progress should be to compare the graph gsmarena did here about battery occupancy and compare it to one that charts battery life over the years. I bet that battery life scores won't keep up in a consistent fashion as the growth of ba...

  • Reply
  • Read all comments
  • Post your comment
Total reader comments: 40

ADVERTISEMENTS

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • BLU
  • Acer
  • Wiko
  • Panasonic
  • verykool
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Top 10 by daily interest

  Device Daily hits  
1.Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra39,172
2.Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro34,422
3.Sony Xperia 1 III30,966
4.Samsung Galaxy Quantum 227,447
5.Xiaomi Redmi Note 1027,250
6.Sony Xperia 5 III25,021
7.Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro24,890
8.Xiaomi Poco F324,581
9.Samsung Galaxy A7223,649
10.Samsung Galaxy A52 5G22,436
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2021 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Contact us Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data