When it comes to Android, there's no good alternative to Google. And I'm ready to pay more for mid-range processor to get Google top-tier support, updates and camera. Because I don't want to struggle with lags, bugs and other surprises from "better" Xiaomi.
GumuGumuNoMi, 08 May 2019Overpriced device, this phone worth 300$ maximum.Yes more realistic
SoundP, 10 May 2019I think some people miss the point of this phone. It's selling point is not specs & benchm... moreFinally someone out of the comments who understands the purpose of this phone. Not every phone out there is competing for flagship specs. Others give that experience using the software. And this is a much affordable method to get straight up Google experience and their camera software.
I think some people miss the point of this phone. It's selling point is not specs & benchmarks for the price, which it gladly sacrifices but still runs fine for most people. It's selling point is the camera and OS support for the price, which outstrips most phones on the market. And it has that headphone jack, a big omission in most phones too. A winner for me.
Galaxy s9 way better at same price
The prices doesn't make sense, better i buy LG G5 or maybe LG G6..
The design of the phone as well as the aspect ratio is outdated. This phone is a 2017 phone.
Snapdragon 670 is mid processor Google selling it price 45000 , Xiaomi or other china brand sells 12000 .
Anonymous, 09 May 2019A phone in 2019 with top and bottom bezels and no edge to edge display....Seriously!!!See who made it, this is a name with weight...GOOGLE. Think of the camera in the mid range....bezel matters the beauty only..
just my opinion :)
Which company made this serie of google phones? If htc made i will go for it,because htc quality is great and the best but other.....i hope htc made it
A bit late but a good step by google. I'm glad they didn't take the iPhone XR path.
One thing that bugs me though is that nowadays no manufacturer bundles a decent headphone with their phones except for HTC...
Anonymous, 09 May 2019A phone in 2019 with top and bottom bezels and no edge to edge display....Seriously!!!i would think before you talk
A phone in 2019 with top and bottom bezels and no edge to edge display....Seriously!!!
AnonD-863872, 09 May 2019how is the battery life?No tests yet... but the battery life must be great in combination with Google software and this CPU...
I can get Galaxy s9 with same price . So much disappointed
how is the battery life?
you know what, i actually like the "dated" design. i kinda miss bezels and it's nice seeing them again here and there
i really don't know why so many people are triggered by this phone tho
if you don't like it, you have tons of other options
also, Dragontrail sounds WAAAAAY cooler than Gorilla Glass
GumuGumuNoMi, 08 May 2019Overpriced device, this phone worth 300$ maximum.You get one of the best of not the best camera on a phone on the market so you want it to cost the same as a $300 chinese adware/spyware junk phone?? This phone is for who values camera performance, that is it and only that, if you don't actually then go get your pocophone, huawei or whatever and get off here.
google succeed by getting popular by giving a good service that everyone can afford it, google fail in smartphone industry is because it doing the same with other brand that just care of profit, not care of the user, and google is still not good in smartphone technology, how they can sell outdated design smartphone with overprice compare to other brand that have better technology in smartphone.
For AI photo have in Pixel, many other brand is doing AI camera, it just wait for a year to take over google Pixel AI camera. iPhone have better video than google pixel now. Huawei can take better low light photo then google pixel now.
it is a shame to google in smartphone which is not google style that always giving that best to the user and this is the strategy bring google to succeed.
This is not a phone. This is a time machine that takes you back to 2017.
Google, please start thinking about hardware and aesthetics, not only software.